Quoting Karsten Self (kmself@ix.netcom.com):
> http://www.campus-technology.com/news_issue.asp?id=153&IssueDate=9/18/2003
>
> So for those who may need a reality check, let me be blunt: the
> "intranet" is dead. The inside of your institutional firewall is
> just like the outside
On Thursday 17 March 2005 22:28, Mitch Patenaude wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:21:49 -0800, Richard Harke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I have to do xhost + in order to run firefox. I found this after googling
> > because it wouldn't run at all. I am behind a NAT router but I would
> > rather n
on Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 02:26:32PM -0800, Mark K. Kim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>
> > on Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:42:41PM -0800, Mark K. Kim [censored] wrote:
> [snip]
> > >$xhost +
> >
> > BAD MARK. NO DONUT. OR COOKIE.
>
> Lols. In theory, yo
on Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 02:13:21PM -0800, Ken Bloom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:28:27 -0800
> "Karsten M. Self" wrote:
> > on Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:42:41PM -0800, Mark K. Kim
> > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >$xhost +
> >
> > BAD MARK. NO DONUT. OR COOKIE.
> >
>
on Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 02:11:06PM -0800, John Wojnaroski ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
>
>
> Karsten M. Self wrote:
>
> >on Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:42:41PM -0800, Mark K. Kim ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> >wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, John Wojnaroski wrote:
> >>[snip]
> >>
> >>
> >>>I'm t
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:21:49 -0800, Richard Harke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have to do xhost + in order to run firefox. I found this after googling
> because it wouldn't run at all. I am behind a NAT router but I would rather
> not do this. On the other hand, I have been using firefox more and
On Thursday 17 March 2005 15:20, Bill Kendrick wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 01:21:52PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > - Mark Kim's "xhost+" advice. DON'T DO THIS. EVER. Google for the
> > reasons, they're well known and tedious to recount. Fortunately,
> > most sane X servers d
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 01:21:52PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> - Mark Kim's "xhost+" advice. DON'T DO THIS. EVER. Google for the
> reasons, they're well known and tedious to recount. Fortunately,
> most sane X servers don't allow this in their default sessions.
It's fine in a LAN
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 02:11:06PM -0800, John Wojnaroski wrote:
> As far as I can tell, this may be one of the few cockpit simulations
> using Linux as the platform rather than all that MS stuff...
> Additionall info on the flightgear website under the projects page
> http://www.flightgear.org/
Closely related topic: Opening an X11 client as a user different from
the one one is logged in as. (The typical situation is that you wish to
open some -- preferably small and conservatively coded -- X11 app with
root-user authority, while logged in as a non-root user.)
I've collected a list of
Mark K. Kim wrote:
BTW, John, you can add a hostname after the '+' sign to allow connections
only from that computer. Example:
$xhost +remote_host_ip_or_name
which would be the next next best thing to ssh -X and MIT magic cookie
thingy.
This is still fairly insecure on the internet, however, as
On Thu 17 Mar 05, 2:26 PM, Mark K. Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> My autoshop teacher once told me that a good mechanic always uses the
> correct wrench for the correct nut, so a good mechanic should never use
> the monkey wrench (a.k.a. adjustable wrench.) But a good mechanic, he
> added, wo
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:42:41PM -0800, Mark K. Kim [censored] wrote:
[snip]
> >$xhost +
>
> BAD MARK. NO DONUT. OR COOKIE.
Lols. In theory, you're right that it's a bad advice. In practice, it's
not a problem, especially for:
1. Brief c
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:28:27 -0800
"Karsten M. Self" wrote:
> on Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:42:41PM -0800, Mark K. Kim
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >$xhost +
>
> BAD MARK. NO DONUT. OR COOKIE.
>
> Please do NOT suggest people try this, particularly...
>
> > *but* this will work only if yo
Karsten M. Self wrote:
on Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:42:41PM -0800, Mark K. Kim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, John Wojnaroski wrote:
[snip]
I'm trying to login into a remote host and have the host export the screen
display back to my machine
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 01:28:27PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>
> on Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:42:41PM -0800, Mark K. Kim ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> >
> > But this works only if the remote computer has a ssh server with X
> > forwarding enabled, which it is by default on most systems I've
>
on Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:42:41PM -0800, Mark K. Kim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, John Wojnaroski wrote:
> [snip]
> > I'm trying to login into a remote host and have the host export the screen
> > display back to my machine
> [snip]
> > "export DISPLAY=my_ip_address:0.0" retu
First: don't start a new thready by replying to a message from an
existing one. Your email headers will cause your message to appear in
the other (unrelated) thread.
Compose a new message and address it to list instead.
on Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:19:02PM -0800, John Wojnaroski ([EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Bryan Richter wrote:
> Mark K. Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, John Wojnaroski wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > I'm trying to login into a remote host and have the host export the screen
> > > display back to my machine
> >
> > The better way is to use ssh with the -X option to con
Mark K. Kim wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, John Wojnaroski wrote:
> [snip]
> > I'm trying to login into a remote host and have the host export the screen
> > display back to my machine
>
> The better way is to use ssh with the -X option to connect to the remote
> computer in the first place.
> [sn
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, John Wojnaroski wrote:
[snip]
> I'm trying to login into a remote host and have the host export the screen
> display back to my machine
[snip]
> "export DISPLAY=my_ip_address:0.0" returns something like "Xlib: client is
> not authorized to connect to server" which seems to ind
Hi,
I'm trying to login into a remote host and have the host export the screen
display back to my machine
With "export DISPLAY=:0.0" will result in the executing program using the
remote host display. Trying
"export DISPLAY=my_ip_address:0.0" returns something like "Xlib: client is
not authori
22 matches
Mail list logo
