On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:08:38PM -0700, Brian Lavender wrote:
> I further discovered that when you download the source tarball that for
> SDL_image 2.0 that it contains a spec file. So, I installed rpmbuild,
> and I built it. Still, I had no success. Somehow, I installed libpng
> version 1.2. I
I further discovered that when you download the source tarball that for
SDL_image 2.0 that it contains a spec file. So, I installed rpmbuild,
and I built it. Still, I had no success. Somehow, I installed libpng
version 1.2. I somehow that that it was the latest. But, it turns out
under Fedora, you
I discovered that rpmbuild can be used to rebuild the rpm from the src
rpm. Problem is that the spec file expects the libs in lib rather than
lib64
Oh well. It looks like I will hit the tarball and compile that.
Perhaps time to figure out how to put together an rpm from scratch...
On Wed, A
So how do I build the rpm from the source rpm?
brian
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 03:34:39PM -0700, Brian Lavender wrote:
> I found the SDL2 image library,
> http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_image/
>
> Fedora packages, just not 64 bit. It just doesn't seem to show for "yum
> search SDL2"
> http:/
I found the SDL2 image library,
http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_image/
Fedora packages, just not 64 bit. It just doesn't seem to show for "yum search
SDL2"
http://juanmabc.fedorapeople.org/packages/SDL2/
Isn't there supposed to be a move to combined architecture?
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 08:
I have been playing around with SDL2. How is it that I get SDL2 image?
I am using Fedora 19. SDL 2 is packaged for Fedora 2, but the image library
doesn't seem to be.
brian
--
Brian Lavender
http://www.brie.com/brian/
"There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to
make it
