Re: [vox-tech] (Moved from [vox]) Errors in software compilation

2005-03-10 Thread Dylan Beaudette
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 11:00 pm, Bill Kendrick wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 05:58:40PM -0800, Mark K. Kim wrote: > > Where's your `./configure` step??? > > In Dylan's original post, he said the configure step worked fine, > but that IS a good question. > > Dylan, can you start fresh and cut

Re: [vox-tech] (Moved from [vox]) Errors in software compilation

2005-03-09 Thread Bill Kendrick
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 05:58:40PM -0800, Mark K. Kim wrote: > Where's your `./configure` step??? In Dylan's original post, he said the configure step worked fine, but that IS a good question. Dylan, can you start fresh and cut-n-paste the initial configure and make steps into an email here? Als

Re: [vox-tech] (Moved from [vox]) Errors in software compilation

2005-03-09 Thread Mark K. Kim
Where's your `./configure` step??? -Mark On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Bill Kendrick wrote: > > Hi Dylan. This kind of question actually belongs over here on vox-tech, > so I've replied here, instead of plain 'vox'... > > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 03:30:13PM -0800, Dylan Beaudette wrote: > > Hi everyone

Re: [vox-tech] (Moved from [vox]) Errors in software compilation

2005-03-09 Thread Micah Cowan
Dylan Beaudette wrote: After copying the GDAL-specific headers to /usr/include: find . -name "*.h" -exec cp '{}' /usr/include/ \; .. make seems to be chugging along fine... I wouldn't have recommended that. At the very least, a -i option to cp would seem appropriate, to ensure against clobbering e

Re: [vox-tech] (Moved from [vox]) Errors in software compilation

2005-03-09 Thread Dylan Beaudette
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 03:28 pm, Bill Kendrick wrote: > Hi Dylan. This kind of question actually belongs over here on vox-tech, > so I've replied here, instead of plain 'vox'... Thanks Bill! > On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 03:30:13PM -0800, Dylan Beaudette wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I am usin