Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vhost multi-queue patch - verify job failing

2016-10-26 Thread Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Hi, Taking look. Yes it is using correct latest branch and Qemu 2.5.0 which is default version of 16.04.1LTS (Debian 1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.5). As still failing, there is question which Qemu version is specifically required (I do not see it in the comments of patch) or if the patch itself is work

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vhost multi-queue patch - verify job failing

2016-10-26 Thread Edward Warnicke
Still failing, but apparently now using the correct CSIT branch: https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/1949/consoleFull "*14:55:18* + git clone https://gerrit.fd.io/r/csit --branch oper-161024" On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) < mkons...@cisco.co

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vhost multi-queue patch - verify job failing

2016-10-26 Thread Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)
Excellent, thanks Ed! And let’s see … -Maciek On 26 Oct 2016, at 22:40, Edward Warnicke mailto:hagb...@gmail.com>> wrote: Maciek, Looks like the patch was based at a point in the past that was pointing to the old CSIT branch. I rebased the patch, so hopefully it will now pick up the correct

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vhost multi-queue patch - verify job failing

2016-10-26 Thread Edward Warnicke
Maciek, Looks like the patch was based at a point in the past that was pointing to the old CSIT branch. I rebased the patch, so hopefully it will now pick up the correct CSIT branch. Ed On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) < mkons...@cisco.com> wrote: > //reduced

[vpp-dev] vhost multi-queue patch - verify job failing

2016-10-26 Thread Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)
//reduced list, updated subject Peter is right: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/2922/16 looking at the last failed job - https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/1940/consoleFull - it's using old csit branch - "CSIT_BRANCH=oper-161017", without ubuntu1604, so pointless. you should reba

[vpp-dev] Workaround for VPP restart issue on VIRL

2016-10-26 Thread Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Dear VPP developers, As it was discussed and proposed on the VPP weekly call this Tuesday we implemented workaround (as a short-term solution until we find and fix the root cause) to try another restart of VPP when it failed (max. three tries are allowed). This workaround has been cherry-picked

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP project committer nomination: Neale Ranns

2016-10-26 Thread Luke, Chris
+1 Chris. From: Dave Barach (dbarach) [mailto:dbar...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 1:31 PM To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: VPP project committer nomination: Neale Ranns I would like to nominate Neale Ranns as a vpp project committer. Neale designed and built the vpp FIB 2.0, a

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP project committer nomination: Neale Ranns

2016-10-26 Thread Damjan Marion (damarion)
+1 On 26 Oct 2016, at 20:36, John Lo (loj) mailto:l...@cisco.com>> wrote: +1 -John From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Florin Coras Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 1:42 PM To: Dave Barach (dbarach) Cc: vpp

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP project committer nomination: Neale Ranns

2016-10-26 Thread John Lo (loj)
+1 -John From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Florin Coras Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 1:42 PM To: Dave Barach (dbarach) Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP project committer nomination: Neale Ranns +1 Florin On Oct 26, 2016

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP project committer nomination: Neale Ranns

2016-10-26 Thread Florin Coras
+1 Florin > On Oct 26, 2016, at 7:30 PM, Dave Barach (dbarach) wrote: > > I would like to nominate Neale Ranns as a vpp project committer. Neale > designed and built the vpp FIB 2.0, a massive contribution. > > History of Neale’s merged contributions to the vpp project: > https://gerrit.fd

[vpp-dev] VPP project committer nomination: Neale Ranns

2016-10-26 Thread Dave Barach (dbarach)
I would like to nominate Neale Ranns as a vpp project committer. Neale designed and built the vpp FIB 2.0, a massive contribution. History of Neale's merged contributions to the vpp project: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/q/status:merged+owner:%22Neale+Ranns+%253Cnranns%25 40cisco.com%253E%22 Wo

Re: [vpp-dev] updated ovs vs. vpp results for 0.002% and 0% loss

2016-10-26 Thread Karl Rister
On 10/26/2016 02:18 AM, Pierre Pfister (ppfister) wrote: > >>> >>> You may also want to try 'chrt -r' on your working processes. This >>> improves scheduling real-time properties. > > I took a look at the google sheet. > I really think you should give 'chrt -r' a try. > Is there a reason why yo

[vpp-dev] Creating an untagged sub interface gives "vlan is already in use"

2016-10-26 Thread Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru
Is this expected behavior? DBGvpp# show interface Name Idx State Counter Count local00down eth-1 1 up eth-2 2 up eth-3 3 up DBGvpp# cre

Re: [vpp-dev] jVpp as independent fd.io project

2016-10-26 Thread Kinsella, Ray
Hi Marek, I am not sure that jVpp is useful outside of VPP, So outside of helping with 1), I am not sure what the benefit would be. I would have to imagine 1) is fixable in some other way. Ray K On 26/10/2016 08:06, Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote: Hi, t

Re: [vpp-dev] updated ovs vs. vpp results for 0.002% and 0% loss

2016-10-26 Thread Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Looks like it is still testing with oper-161017 not oper-161024. + CSIT_BRANCH=oper-161017 + git clone https://gerrit.fd.io/r/csit --branch oper-161017 Can you please use the latest one (code rebase)? Thanks. Peter Mikus Engineer – Software Cisco Systems Limited Planned absence: 28.10., 1.11.,

Re: [vpp-dev] updated ovs vs. vpp results for 0.002% and 0% loss

2016-10-26 Thread Pierre Pfister (ppfister)
The recheck failed. https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/1937/console Are you sure you updated qemu ? Thanks, - Pierre Le 26 oct. 2016 à 07:32, Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) mailto:pmi...@cisco.com>> a écrit : Hello, [+csit-dev] After upgrade of

Re: [vpp-dev] updated ovs vs. vpp results for 0.002% and 0% loss

2016-10-26 Thread Pierre Pfister (ppfister)
Le 25 oct. 2016 à 15:03, Thomas F Herbert mailto:therb...@redhat.com>> a écrit : Pierre, Thanks. On 10/25/2016 03:14 AM, Pierre Pfister (ppfister) wrote: Hello, For now the multi-queue patch is still stuck in gerrit because jenkin's qemu is using an old buggy version... Is this true for all

[vpp-dev] jVpp as independent fd.io project

2016-10-26 Thread Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Hi, this is follow-up to the discussion started on the last VPP weekly meeting. In my opinion, the biggest advantages are: 1) it would make VPP build faster and more stable 2) it would make possible to use build system that supports dependency management and hence is more suitable for java b