Hi Marion,
*Does next release version support hotplugins?*
*BTW, hotplugins is very importance for VPP used for NFV.*
2016-11-24 4:13 GMT+08:00 Damjan Marion :
>
> > On 17 Nov 2016, at 03:07, Chillance Zen wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi, dear all.
> > as far as I know , vpp is derived from cisco 's mat
Hi,
Did you installed all dependencies thru ‘make install-dep’ first ?
On a fresh centos7 system / platform, I always do:
- export PLATFORM=’’ (default is
‘vpp’)
- make bootstrap
- make install-dep
- make pkg-rpm
Christophe
From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 04:53:05PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > You keep assuming that you have the VM started first and
> > > figure out things afterwards, but this does not work.
> > >
> > > Think about a cluster of machines. You want to start a VM in
> > > a way that will ensure compa
Hi Team,
I am using Centos 7 to build the VPP package but while running the vagrant
build command I getting the below error with respect to Kernel headers ( no
such file or directory).
Could you please help and suggest if possible.
[root@localhost 3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64]# uname -r
3.10.0-123.el7.
Forward to:
+sfc-...@lists.opendaylight.org
+vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
+groupbasedpolicy-...@lists.opendaylight.org
-Original Message-
From: honeycomb-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io
[mailto:honeycomb-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Yang, Yi Y
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 8:56 AM
To: Miguel
> On 17 Nov 2016, at 03:07, Chillance Zen wrote:
>
>
> Hi, dear all.
> as far as I know , vpp is derived from cisco 's mature commercial
> product,since accelerated with DPDK,it's very suitable for VNF appliance
> ,and also this is what we are gonna do.one thing which confuses me is how
> vpp s
Buffer size is 2048, if packet is bigger then multiple buffers are chained.
> On 21 Nov 2016, at 12:54, Dmitry Bufistov wrote:
>
> Hi VPP list!
>
> The VPP buffer size is set to 512 bytes in buffer.h
> What about bigger packets? How does VPP handle them?
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> Dmitry
> __
Can you capture trace (trace add af-packet-input 5 / show trace) and share it
here ?
Thanks,
Damjan
On 22 Nov 2016, at 09:16, Chillance Zen
mailto:chillance...@gmail.com>> wrote:
hi,all
when I was trying to use vlan sub-interface as a individual L3 interface (i.e.
configure an IP address
Hi Miguel,
please check if HC sends required capabilities
https://github.com/opendaylight/groupbasedpolicy/blob/82637edd95d47c8fc594bf8fa3027d378183ca0d/renderers/vpp/src/main/java/org/opendaylight/groupbasedpolicy/renderer/vpp/manager/VppNodeManager.java
see initializeRequiredCapabilities() metho
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:15 AM gannega wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation.
>
> So I can use anything I want within the opaque buffer as long as I don't
> presume what happens next.
>
Well... not exactly... there's lots of comments explaining what each field
is union'd for. But there is an opaq
Thanks for the explanation.
So I can use anything I want within the opaque buffer as long as I don't
presume what happens next.
And ... I'm actually doing things I should not in the flowtable (which
wasn't obvious to me until you explained it that way) ... so I'll go fix
that.
Thanks again,
Be
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 5:23 AM gannega wrote:
> Hi Keith,
>
> This is a kind reminder.
>
>
Apologies for tardiness...
> Also, I stumbled upon VPP-320, and especially
> https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/1676/ which adds a 6 Bytes of plugin_metadata
> in the opaque1 union, which has been reopened for n
Hi Keith,
This is a kind reminder.
Also, I stumbled upon VPP-320, and especially
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/1676/ which adds a 6 Bytes of plugin_metadata
in the opaque1 union, which has been reopened for nsh-proxy.
I feel this might be a good way to go which would ensure no collision
between the
Potentially a couple of things wrong:
1.
3756520960 == 223.231.246.0
575366855 == 34.75.102.199
192.168.1.1 == 3232235777
Maybe some Endian badness going on here?
2. Where is the default route pointing at ? I’ve seen IGMP issues where if the
default route isn’t pointing at the desired IGMP
Thanks Keith.
On 22/11/2016 16:40, Keith Burns wrote:
Please note I updated https://wiki.fd.io/view/Meetings to reflect that
TLDK meeting is:
NOW:
- 7am Friday Pacific
WAS:
- 8am Wed Pacfic
___
tldk-dev mailing list
tldk-...@lists.fd.io
https://li
HI,
No requested ip (192.168.1.1/24 ) is not assigned.please find the output in
attached file.
Regards,
Deepak
-"Dave Barach (dbarach)" wrote: -
To: Deepak Jain4 , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
From: "Dave Barach (dbarach)"
Date: 11/21/2016 06:42PM
Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] Problem while setti
16 matches
Mail list logo
