Hi Jon,
comments inline,
Matus
From: Jon Loeliger [mailto:j...@netgate.com]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 9:14 PM
To: Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Cc: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] SNAT API Question
Hi Matus,
I was able to make VPP recognize my network interfaces, despite the fact
that my processor is an older AMD and is missing SSSE3, SSE4.1, and SSE4.2.
So FYI if anybody who owns an older AMD processor comes along, here is what
I did:
0. When upgrading from an even older processor, use thermal
ahhh that makes more sense :) thanks!
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Neale Ranns (nranns)
wrote:
> Hi William,
>
>
>
> One of those it’s easy if you know what to look for bugs, otherwise a real
> headache to find.
>
>
>
> But a one line fix, so I might as well …
>
>
Hi Matus,
Thanks for your answers here.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
> If external_sw_if_index value is ~0 (-1) external_ip_address is ussed from
> API (snat.c line 363).
>
OK, I see that in the code,
Hello Neale,
Thank you very much for the fix and info. I will have a look on test cases.
Regards,
Jan
From: Neale Ranns (nranns)
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 18:35
To: Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Cc: csit-...@lists.fd.io
Hi William,
One of those it’s easy if you know what to look for bugs, otherwise a real
headache to find.
But a one line fix, so I might as well …
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/5440/
/neale
From: on behalf of William McCall
Date: Monday,
Hi Jan,
Thanks for the test code.
I have fixed the crash with:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/5438/
the tests don’t pass, but now because of those pesky IP6 ND packets.
Regards,
neale
From: "Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)"
Date: Monday, 20 February
hmm.. i thought I did with "make debug" and thought the same thing too
(sorta hoping for an easier fix where my talents could be more useful)...
alas, i SI'ed through the vnet_classify_new_table function and got here
and validated all the steps in the macro to yield this bad result (plus
matched
On 02/17/2017 06:18 PM, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote:
Hi Karl
Can you also tell which version of DPDK you were using for OVS and for
VPP (for VPP is it the one bundled with 17.01?).
DPDK 1611 and VPP 1701.
“The pps is the bi-directional sum of the packets received back at the
traffic
Try it with a debug image. Mask==0x1 => SIGSEGV, with probability 1.
Thanks… Dave
From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On
Behalf Of William McCall
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 7:58 AM
To: Ni, Hongjun
Cc: Siamak Abdollahzade
looks like it is getting hung up in pool_get_aligned macro right here..
guessing due to something that was supposed to be done earlier:
if (P)\
_pool_var (l) = vec_len (_pool_var (p)->free_indices);
Hopefully helpful debugging
Hello Neale,
It’s in review: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/4433/
Affected tests are skipped there at the moment.
Regards,
Jan
From: Neale Ranns (nranns)
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 12:49
To: Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Cc:
Hi Jan,
Can you please share the test code, then I can reproduce the problem and debug
it. Maybe push as a draft to gerrit and add me as a reviewer.
Thanks,
neale
From: "Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)"
Date: Monday, 20 February 2017 at 09:41
To:
13 matches
Mail list logo