Re: [vpp-dev] ALG

2017-06-14 Thread Denis Lotarev via vpp-dev
Hi, Ole!Today we are testing SNAT plugin and PPTP connection by public ip and this is not working.Both machines have a static mapping, we are testing pptp by snat hairpin.Even if one machine (in outside VPP netwrok) can trying to connect to machine in inside VPP network (with static mapping by

Re: [vpp-dev] shadow build system change adding test-debug job

2017-06-14 Thread John Lo (loj)
These flush tests should be disabled for now, until Eyal put in a fix. It has to do with timing, that after flush, there is a slight delay before ager run to scan the FIB to delete the stale MACs. We are adding extra code in the L2 forwarding path to fix this issue. There is an ongoing patch

Re: [vpp-dev] shadow build system change adding test-debug job

2017-06-14 Thread Ed Kern (ejk)
alright klement/dave im a bit stuck again… i get about an 60+% failure rate out of test-debug even with higher than normal cpu settings (higher than just what i use for build verify) always right here 19:43:38 ==

[vpp-dev] generated packets contain only zeroes

2017-06-14 Thread Idan Lavie
Hi, I'm using the packet generator to create packets and send them to a specific interface. My stream looks like that: packet-generator new { name s0 limit 1 size 115-115 node GigabitEthernetb/0/0 data { 0x0800: 00d7.8f3e.8b6b -> 1402.ec41.4540 hex

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP: Answer UDP Packets

2017-06-14 Thread Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Hi Alessio, you can take a look at BFD code which a.) creates and sends its own UDP packets - bfd_main.c - bfd_send_periodic() creates, encapsulates (UDP) and sends a packet out b.) loops back packets received - bfd_udp.c - bfd_udp_echo_input() I'm not sure what's your use case, whether you are

[vpp-dev] VPP: Answer UDP Packets

2017-06-14 Thread Alessio Silvestro
Dear all, I implemented a new VPP node that receives UDP traffic using the following function: udp_register_dst_port (vm, PORT, my_node.index , 1 /* is_ip4 */); I am able to parse the packet and I would like to be able to send back an UDP packet. Looking at the source code, the only function

Re: [vpp-dev] QoS/Policy

2017-06-14 Thread Jerome Tollet (jtollet)
Hi Dana, Perhaps, you could take it from here: https://jira.fd.io/browse/HC2VPP-39 Jerome De : au nom de Dana Kutenicsova Date : mercredi 14 juin 2017 à 04:21 À : "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Objet : [vpp-dev] QoS/Policy Hi

[vpp-dev] [FD.io Helpdesk #41921] connection interruptiones between jenkins executor and VIRL servers

2017-06-14 Thread Anton Baranov via RT
Jan: On my side I currently don't see any connectivity problems between jenkins and VIRL servers. Please let me know if you're still having that issue. I'll keep an eye on that problem and if it reapears I'll report that to our cloud provider to check further. Thanks, -- Anton Baranov

Re: [vpp-dev] problem getting udp_register_dst_port interface to work.

2017-06-14 Thread Guy Doucet -X (gudoucet - FLEXTRONICS CANADA DESIGN SERVICES INC at Cisco)
I have one more questions, If I do show int I get the following: TenGigabitEthernet81/0/0 1 up rx packets 1822911 rx bytes 2628637662

Re: [vpp-dev] problem getting udp_register_dst_port interface to work.

2017-06-14 Thread Guy Doucet -X (gudoucet - FLEXTRONICS CANADA DESIGN SERVICES INC at Cisco)
Thanks for your help Neal, I was missing the return route. I added the following and I am now receiving packets: vppctl ip route add 10.10.10.0/24 via 10.30.5.1 TenGigabitEthernet81/0/0 Guy From: Neale Ranns (nranns) Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 4:47 PM To: Guy Doucet -X (gudoucet -

Re: [vpp-dev] ALG

2017-06-14 Thread otroan
Hi Denis, > We are trying to test SIP to asterisk (which outside VPP network) port 5060 > UDP and its work normaly via SNAT plugin (static and dynamic nat working > well).Also we are trying to test SIP to yate (minimal sip server) inside VPP > network with SNAT hairpin and its work correctly

[vpp-dev] QoS/Policy

2017-06-14 Thread Dana Kutenicsova
Hi all, I'm looking for some information about QoS/Policy implementation in VPP. I've found just pieces of documentation about Hierarchical Scheduler and policer-api. Can you please point me to any documentation, presentations dealing with this topic? Thanks, Dana Kutenicsova Software Engineer

Re: [vpp-dev] ALG

2017-06-14 Thread Denis Lotarev via vpp-dev
Hi, Ole. We are trying to test SIP to asterisk (which outside VPP network) port 5060 UDP and its work normaly via SNAT plugin (static and dynamic nat working well).Also we are trying to test SIP to yate (minimal sip server) inside VPP network with SNAT hairpin and its work correctly too. And

[vpp-dev] FW: [FD.io Helpdesk #41921] AutoReply: connection interruptiones between jenkins executor and VIRL servers

2017-06-14 Thread Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
FYI -Original Message- From: FD.io Helpdesk via RT [mailto:fdio-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 14:13 To: Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) Subject: [FD.io Helpdesk #41921] AutoReply: connection interruptiones

[vpp-dev] connection interruptiones between jenkins executor and VIRL servers

2017-06-14 Thread Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Dear held...@fd.io We are observing connection issues between Jenkins executors and VIRL servers that leads to failures of verify jobs (https://jenkins.fd.io/view/vpp/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/,

Re: [vpp-dev] New vpp node

2017-06-14 Thread Alessio Silvestro
Hi Neale, thanks for the info. Just to further clarify for the community. To start vpp with gdb run: ~/vpp/make build && make debug then run: (gdb) r -c /etc/vpp/startup.conf (gdb) bt Best regards, Alessio On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Neale Ranns (nranns) wrote: >

Re: [vpp-dev] ALG

2017-06-14 Thread Denis Lotarev via vpp-dev
Hi! > Certainly cool if you could find a use for VPP this way. Yes, we will be glad to use VPP as hight perfomance NAT server in our infrastructure, if this will work stability :) Nowaday we are using six servers with double 10G NIC with 12 cpu cores every.This works on simple SNAT iptables