blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } Hi, Ole!Yeah, we are testing SNAT 1:1 static mapping without port
forwarding. Only local and external addressing in
That was going to be one of my queries, but forgot to ask. Do we allow that
currently? Probably shouldn't, as you say, for symmetry.
Chris.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Yourtchenko [mailto:ayour...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 17:51
> To: Luke, Chris
Ok! So what do you think if then we were to also disallow applying the ACL that
doesn't exist yet ?
It feels like it would be a matching symmetric behavior "from the other side". ?
--a
On 16 Jun 2017, at 15:38, Luke, Chris wrote:
>> From: Marco Varlese
FYI, 6WIND provides a full PPP stack (L2TP, PPPoE) server and clients. It
tooks years to develop it and unfortunately it has dependencies that
prevent using it with VPP. But it works fine with DPDK. It is available
both under source code or binary only but under specific licensing.
But
the Choonho,
> flowprobe and flow looks like ipfix.
> What is difference?
in short, src/vnet/flow is the "exporting process" and src/plugins/flowprobe is
the "metering process".
flowprobe supports stateful L2, IP4, IP6 flows with reporting of L2, L3 and L4
information.
the exporter only
Hi Denis,
> Today we are testing SNAT plugin and PPTP connection by public ip and this is
> not working.
> Both machines have a static mapping, we are testing pptp by snat hairpin.
> Even if one machine (in outside VPP netwrok) can trying to connect to machine
> in inside VPP network (with
> Is there any plan to surpport pppoe?
Not as far as I know.
Feel free to start a PPP project. You would need to implement some NCPs too.
Cheers,
Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Hi Billy,
> I noticed that 17.04.1 and 17.04.2 releases were not pushed to Nexus (or I'm
> looking in the wrong spot). I think they should be but was wondering if there
> was a reason they weren't.
>
> Example:
>
>
> the Choonho,
s/the/Dear//
:-)
>
>> flowprobe and flow looks like ipfix.
>> What is difference?
>
> in short, src/vnet/flow is the "exporting process" and src/plugins/flowprobe
> is the "metering process".
>
> flowprobe supports stateful L2, IP4, IP6 flows with reporting of L2, L3 and
> L4
Jan,
We are looking into this issue.
Thank you,
Vanessa
On Fri Jun 16 09:12:55 2017, jgel...@cisco.com wrote:
> Hello Anton,
>
> Unfortunately we are still having issues with ssh connection timeouts
> during tests on virl. Could you, please, have a look on it?
>
> Thank you very much.
>
Dear Klement,
thanks for the hint. I had a look at the code bfd_main.c and in particular
at the function bfd_send_periodic().
I wrote the function send_udp_packet() -- see below -- in order to send
out UDP packets.
The function is executed (I can see from the VPP terminal) and no exception
is
> From: Marco Varlese [mailto:marco.varl...@suse.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 9:23
> On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 15:12 +0200, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote:
> > On 6/16/17, Marco Varlese wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 14:22 +0200, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote:
> > >
On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 15:12 +0200, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote:
> On 6/16/17, Marco Varlese wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 14:22 +0200, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote:
> > >
> > > After a bit more thinking - there is a way that should take care of both:
> > >
> > >
Hello Anton,
Unfortunately we are still having issues with ssh connection timeouts during
tests on virl. Could you, please, have a look on it?
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Jan
-Original Message-
From: Anton Baranov via RT [mailto:fdio-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org]
Sent:
Hello Anton,
Unfortunately we are still having issues with ssh connection timeouts during
tests on virl. Could you, please, have a look on it?
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Jan
-Original Message-
From: Anton Baranov via RT [mailto:fdio-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org]
Sent:
On 6/16/17, Marco Varlese wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 14:22 +0200, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote:
>> After a bit more thinking - there is a way that should take care of both:
>>
>> 1) What Chris wrote: have consistent behaviour with non-existent ACL
>> as if the ACL
On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 14:22 +0200, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote:
> After a bit more thinking - there is a way that should take care of both:
>
> 1) What Chris wrote: have consistent behaviour with non-existent ACL
> as if the ACL matching fell off the end of the ACL: if an empty ACL is
>
15.06.2017, 08:18, "Denis Lotarev via vpp-dev" :
> Hi, Ole!
> Today we are testing SNAT plugin and PPTP connection by public ip and this is
> not working.
> Both machines have a static mapping, we are testing pptp by snat hairpin.
> Even if one machine (in outside VPP
18 matches
Mail list logo