Hi,
vbd allows to mount multiple vpp instances and configure bridge domains, also
provides GUI.
I also recall gbp, but I also suggest asking ODL mailing list.
If you are interested in VPP + ODL integration or want to configure VPP using
RESTCONF/NETCONF,
you can use honeycomb and you don't need
Hi, John,
The internal mechanism is very clear to me now.
And do you have any thought about the dead lock on main thread?
BR/Lollita Liu
From: John Lo (loj) [mailto:l...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 11:18 AM
To: Lollita Liu ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Cc:
Hi Lolita,
Thank you for providing information from your performance test with observed
behavior and problems.
On interface creation, including tunnels, VPP always creates dedicated output
and tx nodes for each interface. As you correctly observed, these dedicated tx
and output nodes are not u
Hi all,
I also tested master and stable/1710 release using 1G hugepage.
Below is the test result:
For stable/1710, it could work well using 1G hugepage.
For master, it failed to start up when using 1G hugepage, just like below.
Because 1G hugepage support is required for some performance tests, a
Dear Samuel,
VPP needs 2M hugepages, and you don't have them free
> clib_sysfs_read: open
> `/sys/devices/system/node/node0/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/free_hugepages':
> No such file or directory
> clib_sysfs_read: open
> `/sys/devices/system/node/node1/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/free_hu
Dear Jon,
That makes sense to me. Hopefully Ole will comment with respect to adding
statements of the form
error { FOO_NOT_AVAILABLE, “Resource ‘foo’ is not available } ;
to the new Python PLY-based API generator.
The simple technique used to allocate plugin message-ID’s seems to work OK to
s
Team,
I am trying to dump the session table (show acl-plugin sessions) to view the
session info but don’t see any sessions getting created. Any input will be
helpful.
Plugin Version
vat# acl_plugin_get_version
vl_api_acl_plugin_get_version_reply_t_handler:133: ACL plugin version: 1.3
Following
Hey VPP Aficionados,
I would like to make a proposal for a new way to introduce error codes
into the VPP code base. The two main motivations for the proposal are
1) to improve the over-all error messages coupled to their API calls,
and
2) to clearly delineate the errors for VNET from tho
Folks,
Just a heads-up that I have submitted a patch that alters both the
API and the CLI for the memif functions. That patch is being reviewed
and will (hopefully) be merge soon.
Prior to the patch, the memif CLI supported a create and a delete
command roughly like this:
vppctl# create mem
Hello vpp-dev,
I've encountered an issue when trying to run VPP using default configuration on
baremetal (512GB RAM, 36 phys cores, Ubuntu16.04). It appears to be related to
dpdk memory allocation, and only occurs on VPP 18.01, not on 17.10.
Just wondering if anyone's seen this before, and/or
I am finding only one vpp app out there called vpp vbd for odl...It only lets u
create bridge domains but lacks other major stuffs like tap and veth interface
creation etc..and many more functionsquestion 1.are there other apps
available? Question 2.can users create their own yang models and
Hi, Klement.
Thank you for your response. We will check the patch carefully. But I
still have question about why IP reassemble is not there or be treated with
lower priority. I think IP reassemble is mandatory feature as tunnel
endpoint Please share with me about your thought. Thank
Hi,
I am not aware of any effort now, nor in plan, for MPLS TP. Contributions are
welcome ☺
Regards,
neale
-Original Message-
From: on behalf of Алексей Болдырев
Date: Friday, 19 January 2018 at 22:40
To: vpp-dev , vpp-dev-request
Subject: [vpp-dev] MPLS-TP support
Please tell
Hi,
We are do performance testing on GTP of VPP source code,
testing the GTPU performance impact by creating/removing tunnel. Found some
curious thing and one bug.
Testing GTP encryption via one CPU across different rx and tx
port on same NUMA, with 10K pre-cr
This is not an argument against implementing IP fragmentation and reassembly,
but...
> My question is why IP reassemble is not supported in VPP? It is
> understandable that IP reassemble is not required for pure packet forwarding.
> But as a router platform, there are also plenty of control pla
Hi Lollita Liu,
I am not in position of decision-making and I do not know the project
priorities...
I'll have to leave this question open for others to answer.
Thanks,
Klement
> -Original Message-
> From: Lollita Liu [mailto:lollita@ericsson.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 3:
16 matches
Mail list logo