Hi Juan,
When setting multicast routes one must specify the accepting (or RPF) interface
for the prefix. So, additionally, you need;
ip mroute add 224.0.0.5 via GigabitEthernet0/7/0 Accept
note though that while an interface can be configured to be both and accepting
and forwarding interface
Hi Jon,
I feel I must ask ☺
“That has to match a VPP interface by name. But what name?”
why does it need to match a VPP interface name? shouldn’t = MyVxlan23. Your
control plane maintains mappings between MyVxlan23 and VPP’s sw_if_index.
/neale
From: on behalf of Jon Loeliger
Date: Friday
Hello, my name is Hitoshi Kaneko.
I belong to NTT Laboratories.
I evaluate VPP and there have been questions.
(1)Question 1
I have wanted to evaluate Access Control List of VPP.
About this feature, I have used acl_add_replace and
acl_interface_set_acl_list commands and I have seen packets st
I guess Jon’s point was the control plane need to know exactly what X would be
and not rely on VPP to provide the sw_if_index or query VPP for the name after
the VXLAN create request. This makes the control plane CLI script/template
support more straight forward. In the case of mixed usage whe
Kaneko-San,
My replies inline below... hope they help you.
> On 7 Feb 2018, at 12:43, kaneko wrote:
>
> Hello, my name is Hitoshi Kaneko.
>
> I belong to NTT Laboratories.
>
> I evaluate VPP and there have been questions.
>
>
>
> (1)Question 1
>
> I have wanted to evaluate Access Contro
But all control planes need to know the sw_if_index provided by VPP as it is
this value (and not the interface name) that one needs to subsequently
configure the interface. So why the reliance of VPP’s given name? AFIAK VPP’s
given name is only important when interpreting CLI output.
All contro
Greetings FD.io community!
We apologize for the relatively late notice, as this normally would have
been communicated earlier.
The Linux Foundation has connected with a new vendor called Groups.io,
which provides mailing list services in a simple but modern interface.
Groups.io offers all of the
Hi All,
Does VPP support flow control?
If yes, how to turn on/off flow control?
Regards,
Charlie Li
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
> On 7 Feb 2018, at 19:12, Li, Charlie wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Does VPP support flow control?
>
> If yes, how to turn on/off flow control?
Not supported today but can be it shouldn't be too hard to add.
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Neale,
I think this really really fundamentally comes down to the ability to
configure in batch. If I know I want to send something to vpp that creates
an interface and configures it in a *batch*, I can't know when I send that
batch configuration what sw_index will be. So I either have to break
.. aand then one of the calls in the batch fails. Why not use a shim layer that
on the one hand fits what Neale was saying and on the other it accepts batches
and handles failures. Say .. netconf? :-)
Florin
> On Feb 7, 2018, at 2:10 PM, Ed Warnicke wrote:
>
> Neale,
>
> I think this really
11 matches
Mail list logo
