Re: [vpp-dev] Power-cycle vpp home-gateway: nat44 static mapping vanishes

Hi Dave, Static mapping entry is deleted from resolution vector after address is set on interface snat_ip4_add_del_interface_address_cb: /* If we resolved any of the outstanding static mappings */ if (vec_len(indices_to_delete)) { /* Delete them */ for (j

Re: [vpp-dev] Very poor performance vm to vm via VPP vhostuser

Hi, Sara, May I know what image you are using to achieving the good performance with VPP? I assume you are running the same iperf3 testings? Thanks very much! Regards, Yichen From: on behalf of Sara Gittlin Date: Sunday, March 25, 2018 at 5:31 AM

[vpp-dev] Power-cycle vpp home-gateway: nat44 static mapping vanishes

Subtle annoyance #67 - "OK, we had a power failure. Where is my static out2in nat44 mapping?" - explained. I use vpp as a home gateway, in conjunction with a cable modem. The following debug CLI command works perfectly, except in a full power-cycle router and cable modem scenario: "nat44 add

Re: [vpp-dev] Very poor performance vm to vm via VPP vhostuser

Fyi When i launch another image (not based on the clear-linux-kvm) - i'm achieving good performance (exactly like ovs-dpdk - which is expected in single flow/mac ) any idea why ? this is the launch cmdline: [anyway i cant find a way to set the tx/rx-queue-size) sudo qemu-system-x86_64 -name

Re: [vpp-dev] Very poor performance vm to vm via VPP vhostuser

Thank Steven and Alec I'm using the iperf as a basic tool to check sanity - i'll run pktgen on the VMs later. the resut i'm got 20Mbps (~20K pps) throughput and latency of 1ms is not iperf issue. Steven - you suggest to set the rx-queue-size when lanuching the VM but unfortunately i dont find