Dear all,
I would like to remind you that API freeze (F0) for release 18.10 is exactly
in 2 weeks from now. If you are not aware yet of the release schedule, please,
take a moment to familiarize yourself with it by visiting [1].
Please, whilst I do my best to review the submitted code, be proac
Hi guys,
I'm testing the sr mpls. I found the example show of l3vpn with sr mpls in
https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Segment_Routing_for_MPLS.
Is there any example show about l2vpn with sr mpls? Is the vpp support l2vpn
with sr mpls?
Thanks,
Xue
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all m
Hello,
I am using stable_18_01.
I have been observing a delay in setting the 10G NIC interface state to UP.
It is apparent from VPP CLI itself that using “set interface state
TenGigabitEthernet3/0/0 up” taking some time.
And I also see that the SHM client api “sw_interface_set_flags” fails in
t
typedef struct
{
u32 sw_if_index;
u32 flags;
// config entry is-valid flag
// exact match flags (valid if packet has 0/1/2/3 tags)
// L2 vs L3 forwarding mode
#define SUBINT_CONFIG_MATCH_0_TAG (1<<0)
#define SUBINT_CONFIG_MATCH_1_TAG (1<<1)
#define SUBINT_CONFIG_MATCH_2_TAG (1<
We've been seeing NA/ND issues. We're just not sure where it's coming from
(vpp, driver, NIC, switch).
What's odd is that, we have two nearly identical ipv6 interfaces hooked up to
different ports on the same switch, and while one goes through NA/ND
nicely...the other does not.
What we've been
Fd.io pages states following in the “create sub-interfaces” section:
Example of how to created a subinterface to process untagged packets:
vpp# create sub-interfaces GigabitEthernet2/0/0 5 untagged
I am trying to do exactly same thing mentioned above and it fails. Is this a
known issue (a bug) ??
VPP has supported IPv6 NA/NS for a while. I believe this process was added for
VPP to support RS/RA.
Ole, Can you confirm if my understanding is correct?
Regards,
John
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of sheckman
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 6:29 PM
To: John Lo (loj) ; Dave Barach (dba
John,
>From looking at the changes, it seems it also addresses some ipv6 neighbor
>discovery issues?
Thanks,
Steve
On 09/18/2018 06:13 PM, John Lo (loj) wrote:
In 1804 the rd-cp-process would run frequently in the main thread to cause your
observation of CPU usage. It can be observed in your
In 1804 the rd-cp-process would run frequently in the main thread to cause your
observation of CPU usage. It can be observed in your "show run" output under
main thread that this process went through suspend/run cycle many times
(highlighted in bold red below).
This was fixed under Jira ticket
Dave,
That isn't our real application, which does run higher PPS rates:
vpp# show run
Thread 0 vpp_main (lcore 30)
Time 50182.3, average vectors/node 1.00, last 128 main loops 0.00 per node 0.00
vector rates in 6.7225e-1, out 6.8335e-1, drop 5.9782e-3, punt 0.e0
Thread 1 vpp_wk_0 (lcore 12)
Was not sure if this email is being delivered properly or not, so, sending a
new email with the old email trail:
Looking to understand the significance of “SUBINT_CONFIG_VALID” flag. When is
it set and why ? untagged sub-interface creation fails when this flag is set.
Question is when is this
Hi All,
Creation of a sub-interface with ‘untagged’ option fails with the message “
create sub-interfaces: vlan is already in use” . Any idea what I am missing
here ? There is no other configs present and trying to create sub-interface for
the first time.
vpp# create sub-interfaces GigabitEthe
Looking to understand the significance of “SUBINT_CONFIG_VALID” flag. When is
it set and why ? untagged sub-interface creation fails when this flag is set.
Question is when is this flag being set at first place ?? Does this flag
indicate that a valid vlan is configured on this interface ? Still
At that PPS rate, you don't need two worker threads. The worker threads burn a
bunch of cycles - poll-wait or not - doing next-to-nothing. Try running the
main thread all by itself...
D.
-Original Message-
From: Heckman, Steve
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 5:15 PM
To: Dave Barach
We back-merged the unix poll wait timeout and a 100 usec delay gets us
down to maybe 15%. Just wondering why the change originally.
top -H:
top - 17:09:45 up 19 days, 2:07, 7 users, load average: 5.72, 5.85, 5.69
Threads: 491 total, 7 running, 484 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s):
"show run" please...
-Original Message-
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of sheckman
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 4:58 PM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: [vpp-dev] Increase in main core CPU usage between 17.10 and 18.04
I've been seeing a dramatic increase in CPU usage by the v
I've been seeing a dramatic increase in CPU usage by the vpp_main task.
It used to be around 0.3%.
Now it's around 85%.
I've pored over the release notes and design docs, but haven't found an
explanation for this.
Why the increase?
Thanks,
Steve Heckman
Principal Software Engineer
Arris Gr
Hi,
VAPI is autogenerated from .json files, which are generated from .api
files. The API you are asking about is in
src/vnet/classify/classify.api. See that file's history on when it
appeared. As for your second question - I don't see any `obscure-mask`
nor `clear-param` parameters. If you are ask
Hi Damjan,
Got it.
Any recommendation on how to implement client-to-site vpn with vpp 18.10? I
am not keen on using ikev2.
Thanks.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:50 PM Damjan Marion wrote:
> Dear carlito,
>
> Native ikev2 in vpp is poc code, i would not consider it as a mature ikev2
> implementati
Dear Rubina,
On 9/18/18, Rubina Bianchi wrote:
> Dear Andrew,
>
> Our changes is provided to you by creating a patch which is attached to this
> email.
> I didn't commit it to gerrit due to our specific scenario (permit+reflect on
> all inputs, permit+reflect or deny on all outputs).
Why do you
The normal pattern in VPP is what we call ‘Dataplane Management Agents’.
VPP is an amazing dataplane, feature rich and fast. It exposes a fast and
rich API via a shared memory message bus,
and we autogenerate C, C++, Python, Java, Lua, and Go APIs for it.
When you want to expose some element of
Hi Ed Warnicke
Thank you for the kindly reply, and you are right, I made mistake when changing
the configuration file with a syntactically error.
Now it is ok.
Thx again.
发件人: Ed Warnicke [mailto:hagb...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2018年9月14日 20:20
收件人: Evan Wang
抄送: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
主题: Re: [
Hello!
Can anyone in this mail list comment on this?
I am evaluating the feasibility of using VPP to build a Security gateway
product.
The product requirement has the following items:
The Security gateway should support at least 10K Ipsec tunnels and at
least 10G uplink dat
Hi
Thanks for your reply.
It is look like VPP does not support any kind of OAM system(like SNMP,TR069, or
web based management page)
Am I right?
If I want to support SNMP server or TR069 client to VPP based product,
What is your suggestion? Build them from scratch or there already exist
somethin
+vpp-dev,
Dear tianye,
please use public mailer .
--
Damjan
> On 18 Sep 2018, at 13:44, Klement Sekera wrote:
>
> I'm working on the ipsec code, but I'm not it's maintainer and it's
> all still new to me.
>
> Quoting tianye (2018-09-18 13:08:54)
>> I am sorry, I thought these questions migh
Hi Klement，
I'm sorry to trouble you again.
First，Have The classify_add_del_session vapi not exist yet @18.04?
Second，How can I get the vapi_classify_add_del_table 's obscure-mask from
clear-param ”l2|l3|l4 + ip4|ip6 + protocol + dst|src + tcp|udp + ... ” ?
(Like CLI_COMMAND-clear-param
Hi,
We are installing VPP with DPDK on our intel Xeon 24 core server. We have
installed VPP. But due to some unforseen reasons, we are now getting the
following error log with
$sudo vppctl show status
● vpp.service - vector packet processing engine
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/vpp.servi
Dear Andrew,
Our changes is provided to you by creating a patch which is attached to this
email.
I didn't commit it to gerrit due to our specific scenario (permit+reflect on
all inputs, permit+reflect or deny on all outputs).
In addition to ICMP timeout handling, our code fixes some ICMP bugs. A
Hi Rubina,
> On 18 Sep 2018, at 11:14, Rubina Bianchi wrote:
>
> Hi Dear Andrew
>
> 1) I just attached my init.conf to this email. As you guessed session table
> size is 100. This problem is occurred on vpp stable/1807.
Ah, cool, that helps, thanks!
>
> 2) Yes, there is 6 timeout li
Hi Dear Andrew
1) I just attached my init.conf to this email. As you guessed session table
size is 100. This problem is occurred on vpp stable/1807.
2) Yes, there is 6 timeout list. We added a list for handling icmp timeouts.
From: Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko
Sent:
Hi Tianye,
I suppose VPP is a good choice acting as a fast-path, free and efficient.
And I think most of the requirements listed in your mail are supported by
native VPP.
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Tian Ye2(田野)
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018
31 matches
Mail list logo
