Re: [vpp-dev] Oldest supported DPDK version

2018-10-11 Thread Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io
> On 11 Oct 2018, at 16:52, Stephen Hemminger > wrote: > > The DPDK plugin has problems with non-PCI devices. It is using the old DPDK > assumptions that all > devices are really PCI. There are various special cases in there already, but > it needs to be > fixed properly by using the DPDK

[vpp-dev] Oldest supported DPDK version

2018-10-11 Thread Stephen Hemminger
The DPDK plugin has problems with non-PCI devices. It is using the old DPDK assumptions that all devices are really PCI. There are various special cases in there already, but it needs to be fixed properly by using the DPDK bus model. The fix isn't hard, my question is how far back in DPDK

Re: [vpp-dev] Verification always fail with stable/1801

2018-10-11 Thread John Lo (loj) via Lists.Fd.Io
Thanks Marco. I noticed your patch for extrenal/MakeFile on stable/1801 was merged. I suppose we need to rebase all the outstanding patches for 1801 and verification should work now. I will do it for the patches I am involved. -John From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Marco Varlese

[vpp-dev] vpp WRED AQM example and performance test?

2018-10-11 Thread Ge, Xiaozhong (US)
It seems the fd.io/vpp supports the WRED AQM features based on the docs at URL https://docs.fd.io/vpp/16.12/md_vnet_vnet_devices_dpdk_qos_doc.html Does anyone have any examples and performance test data for WRED AQM in vpp? Thanks, Tony -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages

Re: [vpp-dev] Verification always fail with stable/1801

2018-10-11 Thread Marco Varlese
Yes, there's troubles with 2 things:1) package naming2) packagecloud bionic "repo" Both things are getting addressed. HTH,Marco On Thu, 2018-10-11 at 15:00 +, John Lo (loj) via Lists.Fd.Io wrote: > It seems verifications are always failing for patches on stable/1801 branch. > Does anyone know

[vpp-dev] Verification always fail with stable/1801

2018-10-11 Thread John Lo (loj) via Lists.Fd.Io
It seems verifications are always failing for patches on stable/1801 branch. Does anyone know why? The following patch with a simple one line change is an example which fails all 3 verification attempts: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/15222/ Regards, John -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive

Re: [vpp-dev] Delete IPv6 VXLAN fails

2018-10-11 Thread Neale Ranns via Lists.Fd.Io
+Eyal I expect it was broken by efd9cf302. /neale De : au nom de "Michal Cmarada via Lists.Fd.Io" Répondre à : "Michal Cmarada -X (mcmarada - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" Date : jeudi 11 octobre 2018 à 15:30 À : "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Cc : "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Objet : [vpp-dev]

[vpp-dev] Any WREQ examples in VPP?

2018-10-11 Thread via Lists.Fd.Io
Hi,It seems the FD.io/VPP supports the WRED AQM features based on the docs at https://docs.fd.io/vpp/16.12/md_vnet_vnet_devices_dpdk_qos_doc.html Does anyone have any examples how to configure/setup the WREQ in VPP?  I really appreciate your helps. Thanks, Tony -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[vpp-dev] Delete IPv6 VXLAN fails

2018-10-11 Thread Michal Cmarada via Lists.Fd.Io
Hi, I was trying to setup and delete IPV6 vxlan tunel using vpp_api_test: vat# vxlan_tunnel_dump sw_if_index instance src_address dst_address encap_vrf_id decap_next_index vni mcast_sw_if_index vat# vxlan_add_del_tunnel src 10::10 dst 10::11 vni 88