Re: [vpp-dev] How to save VPP configuration

Hi, setup.gate should contain set of VPP CLI which you want to be persistent. Regards, Chetan Bhasin On Sat, Jul 20, 2019, 06:43 wrote: > Hi Dave, > > what's the 'startup-config /etc/setup.gate' should be looks like? > Does it have a doc describe the syntax of this file? > > Thanks! -=-=-=-=-=

Re: [vpp-dev] How to save VPP configuration

Hi Dave, what's the ' startup-config /etc/setup.gate ' should be looks like? Does it have a doc describe the syntax of this file? Thanks! -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#13534): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/13534 Mute This

Re: [vpp-dev] Ubuntu1604 merge job is broken

Before, it was easier to read but also misleading. Indeed, NAME field was actually empty because the definition of the maccro : "add_vpp_packaging name" was putting "NAME" in "name" and "vomVENDORfd.ioDESCRIPTIONVPP Object Model" in ARGN for parsing by cmake_parse_arguments (cmake>=3.5 only btw

[vpp-dev] VPP 19.01.3 Maintenance Release is complete

Hi all, The VPP 19.01.3 Maintenance Release is complete and the VPP artifacts are available in the release area on PackageCloud.io and Nexus. See VPP wiki for instructions on how to download and install the release packages: https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Installing_VPP_binaries_from_packages VPP

Re: [vpp-dev] Ubuntu1604 merge job is broken

Oh cool, seems you are much further on it than me, so I yield to your work. Thanks for looking ! The only (ignorant user) comment is about https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/20756/4/extras/vom/CMakeLists.txt - seems like it loses a bit of readability... wonder if there is a way to keep that somehow. B

Re: [vpp-dev] Ubuntu1604 merge job is broken

I am working on having cpack-based packages respect vpp packages name format: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/20756/ . The problem comes from add_vpp_packaging rather than vom. Yohan > -Original Message- > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Andrew > Yourtchenko > Sent: vendredi 19 juill

Re: [vpp-dev] Ubuntu1604 merge job is broken

I reproduced the problem on 16.04, somehow the name is goofed - it has “Linux” in the package name rather than the standard architecture name. I suspect vom isn’t really arch-agnostic, so probably it is not a nice idea to name it this way :-) Interestingly building on 18.04 the name does contai

[vpp-dev] fd.io vpp spurious patch validation failures this AM

Here's an example. 07:41:52 Triggered by Gerrit: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/20739 07:41:52 ERROR: Issue with creating launcher for agent jenkins-fdda26a06e89c. The agent is being disconnected 07:41:52 [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. 07:41:52 ERROR: SEVERE ERROR occurs 07:41:52 org.j

[vpp-dev] Try to rum Modified vpp inside the container

Hi, I try to patch my vpp inside development image container ( vpp/dev vswitch) and I follow https://github.com/contiv/vpp/blob/master/docker/DEVIMAGE.md link to remove old vpp and install my modified vpp If I do remove command :apt remove vpp I got below error: [/var/lib/dpkg/info/vpp.postrm:

[vpp-dev] Ubuntu1604 merge job is broken

Paul has already commented [0] on this, hopefully my subject draws more attention. Basically, packagecould does not like the look of ubuntu1604 VOM package, leading not only to missing VOM package, but also other packages unlucky enough to come after VOM in upload order. This includes packages s