Ah... I see. That explains everything!
Thanks for catching this.
It will be more helpful to let vpp print more meaningful logs or have
better documentation.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 7:17 AM Benoit Ganne (bganne)
wrote:
> Hi Chuan,
>
> I took a deeper look at your conf and actually realized
Hi Chuan,
I took a deeper look at your conf and actually realized that the dpdk 'workers'
stanza does not refer to core number but to worker id.
So, when you say "cpu { corelist-workers 4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22 }" you
define 10 workers with id from 0 to 9 and pin them to specific cores (4,6
Hi all,
I'm testing multiple tenants using nat44-snat, and turns out tenants might be
mixed.
Assuming two tenants 200 (fib index 1) and 100 (fib index 2):
vpp# show ip fib table 100
ipv4-VRF:100, fib_index:2, flow hash:[src dst sport dport proto ]
locks:[src:CLI:7, src:plugin-low:1,
Yulong,
Ed Kern updated the job executor yesterday morning. I have issued a
recheck on your patch which should now pass checkstyle.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
-daw-
On 11/14/2019 1:44 AM, Pei, Yulong wrote:
Hello vpp-dev & csit-dev,
Thank you Dave.
Will import this patch and try.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Murthy
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#14597): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/14597
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/55586364/21656
Group Owner:
> Makefile by testing for JENKINS_URL?
Inputs to the program make should be understandable by human.
When I want to predict locally what would the checkstyle job vote,
I prefer something like:
make checkstyle-all
rather than:
JENKINS_URL=jenkins.fd.io make checkstyle
Or did you mean a
Coverity run failed today.
Current number of outstanding issues are 5
Newly detected: 0
Eliminated: 0
More details can be found at
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/fd-io-vpp/view_defects
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#14595):
Please take a look at https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/23427.
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Satya Murthy
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 8:24 PM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] fd to poll in VPP-API-CLIENT with no RX thread
Thanks a lot Dave for offering the help.
The
Hi all,
Anyone get this working? When I enable nat44 forwarding, all NAT
translations stop working.
example - 110.21.22.12 is the IP address of my wan0.
I have:
set interface nat44 in loop0 out wan0
Without forwarding:
vpp# sh nat44 sessions
NAT44 sessions:
thread 0 vpp_main: 2240
