Re: [vpp-dev] Query regarding bonding in Vpp 19.08

Thanks Steven for the response. As per VPP 18.01 , only Bonded interface state is show in "show interface " CLI . Thanks, Chetan On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 8:49 PM Steven Luong (sluong) wrote: > First, your question has nothing to do with bonding. Whatever you are > seeing is true regardless

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-report] Regressions as of 2020-04-03 14:00:14 UTC #email

> 3n-hsw Around 2nd of April there happened a regression in eth-l2bdscale1mmaclrn test, visible here [0]. Trending needed multiple runs to identify it is there, and alerting is configured not to report "old" regressions (so it did not report this one). Anyway, the closer look shows previously

Re: [vpp-dev] Query regarding bonding in Vpp 19.08

First, your question has nothing to do with bonding. Whatever you are seeing is true regardless of bonding configured or not. Show interfaces displays the admin state of the interface. Whenever you set the admin state to up, it is displayed as up regardless of the physical carrier is up or

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-report] Regressions as of 2020-04-18 14:00:15 UTC #email

> -rnd-mrr This is a consequence of [0], fixing an old bug in CSIT code. Previously, the traffic was not random enough. Vratko. [0] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/csit/+/26456 -Original Message- From: csit-rep...@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of nore...@jenkins.fd.io Sent: Saturday, 2020-April-18

Re: [vpp-dev] perftest stuck: "do_not_use_dut2_ssd_failure"

Ack, thanks for the info. From: Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco) Sent: Monday, April 20, 2020 4:40 AM To: Dave Barach (dbarach) ; csit-...@lists.fd.io Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: RE: perftest stuck: "do_not_use_dut2_ssd_failure" Hello Dave, 3n-skx perf job has been

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-report] Progressions as of 2020-04-19 02:00:13 UTC #email

> 3n-hsw Progressions showing the fixes described in [4] do restore the previous performance. Vratko. [4] https://lists.fd.io/g/csit-report/message/2488 -Original Message- From: csit-rep...@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of nore...@jenkins.fd.io Sent: Sunday, 2020-April-19 06:07 To:

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-report] Regressions as of 2020-04-15 02:00:17 UTC #email

> 3n-hsw This turned out to be a bug on CSIT side, breaking numa detection, affecting every NIC on numa 1. The bug was introduced in [0] and fixed in [1] and [2]. Vratko. [0] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/csit/+/25363 [1] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/csit/+/26569 [2]

Re: [vpp-dev] perftest stuck: "do_not_use_dut2_ssd_failure"

Hello Dave, 3n-skx perf job has been aborted. I guess you can use 2n-skx testbed to test your changes so, please, use trigger perftest-2n-skx. ETA for availability of 3n-skx perf testbeds is unknown at the moment as we are waiting for new/repaired SSDs. Regards, Jan From:

Re: [vpp-dev] worker barrier state

Hi Chris, Comments inline... On 15/04/2020 15:14, "Christian Hopps" wrote: Hi Neale, I agree that something like 4, is probably the correct approach. I had a side-meeting with some of the ARM folks (Govind and Honnappa), and we thought using a generation number for the state

[vpp-dev] Query regarding bonding in Vpp 19.08

Hi, I am using vpp 19.08 , When I use bonding configuration , I am seeing below output of "show int " CLI . Query : Is it ok to show the status of slave interface as up in "show interface" CLI while as per the show hardware-interface its down ? vpp# show int Name Idx State MTU (L3/IP4/IP6/MPLS)