Hi -
Is it possible to steer L3 multicast packets (either IPv4 or IPv6) into an SRv6
policy? I tried using "sr steer l3" command but it seems only to create a
routing entry in the unicast FIB, which isn't invoked since multicast packets
are handled by "ip4-mfib-forward-lookup".
This is what I
If you want to pinch code from vpp_api_test, please read and understand it:
/* W: wait for results, with timeout */
#define W(ret) \
do {\
f64 timeout = vat_time_now (vam) + 1.0;
Hi Ben,
Thanks, I tested that now but it did not help, it behaves the same also
with "MLX5_SHUT_UP_BF=1" set.
/ Elias
> Can you try to export "MLX5_SHUT_UP_BF=1" in your environment before
> starting VPP (ie, VPP environment must contain this)? This should
> disable the "BlueFlame" mechanism in M
> Thanks, now I tried it (the Patchset 2 variant) but it seems to behave
> like before, the delay is sitll happening.
Hmm thanks ☹
Can you try to export "MLX5_SHUT_UP_BF=1" in your environment before starting
VPP (ie, VPP environment must contain this)? This should disable the
"BlueFlame" mechan
Hi Ben,
Thanks, now I tried it (the Patchset 2 variant) but it seems to behave
like before, the delay is sitll happening.
Let me know if you have something more I could try.
/ Elias
On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 12:04 +, Benoit Ganne (bganne) via
lists.fd.io wrote:
> Hi Elias,
>
> Thanks for the
Chinmaya,
I don't think linking in vatplugin is a "supported" interface. Meaning it can
change or go away at no notice.
If you build a C application you'd likely be happier with using VAPI.
Cheers,
Ole
> On 26 Jun 2020, at 13:58, Chinmaya Aggarwal wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
> We have our application
Chinmaya,
> To reiterate what we have understood, if we downgrade the api and declare it
> experimental (by setting "option version = 0.0.1"), we need not add "option
> status="in_progress" for the typedefs and messages we are modifying and we
> can simply use the original typedefs and message
Hi Elias,
Thanks for the detailed report. I suspect you are correct, it seems to be
related to the doorbell update to notify the NIC there are some work to do.
Could you check https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/27708 and report whether it
fixes the issue?
Best
ben
> -Original Message-
> Fr
Hi,
To reiterate what we have understood, if we downgrade the api and declare it
experimental (by setting "option version = 0.0.1"), we need not add "option
status="in_progress" for the typedefs and messages we are modifying and we can
simply use the original typedefs and messages and do the de
Hi Dave,
We have our application (using VPP C API) running outside of VPP. We linked
vpp libs in our application ( vatplugin, vppinfra, vlibmemoryclient, svm,
vppapiclient). Attaching file vpp_connect_test.c that creates connection with
VPP and calls VPP C API to modify a sr policy. We have use
Hi Chinmaya,
Yeah - the only thing typedef can not be marked as in-progress (Do you think it
is useful to add such a function?)
The other approach is if the community using those APIs thinks the SR-related
messages still need some quicker iteration, an option is to declare them as
“in-progress
> On Jun 26, 2020, at 4:22 AM, Neale Ranns (nranns) wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> As far as I'm concerned, it's your plugin, you can add whatever functionality
> you need. If you separate the new interface type out into another plugin, so
> it can be used without your feature, then the community
Chinmaya,
You have a couple of options.
You can downgrade the whole API and declare it experimental. That's done by
setting the semantic version to less than 1 in the .api file.
e.g. option version="0.0.1";
You can leave the API in production status, but mark those messages you believe
will cha
Hello VPP experts,
There seems to be a problem with the RDMA driver in VPP when using
Mellanox ConnectX5 network interfaces. This problem appears for the
master branch and for the stable/2005 branch, while stable/2001 does
not have this problem.
The problem is that when a frame with 2 packets is
Hi Andrew,
We have gone through the api change process link. As per our understanding from
the link, we have to create a new in-progress message for srv6_sid_list i.e
typedef srv6_sid_list_v2
{
u8 num_sids;
u32 weight;
u32 sl_index;
vl_api_ip6_address_t sids[16];
option status="in_progr
Hi Chris,
As far as I'm concerned, it's your plugin, you can add whatever functionality
you need. If you separate the new interface type out into another plugin, so it
can be used without your feature, then the community will benefit twice. Let's
just make sure we document the whys and hows of
16 matches
Mail list logo
