Re: [vpp-dev] Issue in VRRP functionality when compiling with devtoolset-7 with single worker configuration

2020-08-10 Thread Matthew Smith via lists.fd.io
Hi Amit, This patch was merged on friday to address the same issue - https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/28192. Please try applying that patch to your build and let me know if it fixes the problem. Thanks, -Matt On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:55 AM Amit Mehra wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > Can you please

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp19.08.2 crypto_ia32 do not support aes-gcm icv_size 8/12 crypto

2020-08-10 Thread Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io
This issue is already fixed in master, see: https://git.fd.io/vpp/commit/?id=415b4b0 - Damjan -Original Message- From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> On Behalf Of ??? Sent: lundi 10 août 2020 10:11 To: Damjan Marion (damarion)

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp19.08.2 crypto_ia32 do not support aes-gcm icv_size 8/12 crypto

2020-08-10 Thread Benoit Ganne (bganne) via lists.fd.io
Hi, Thanks for digging into this issue! Could you propose a patch and associated unit tests in gerrit? Best ben > -Original Message- > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of ??? > Sent: lundi 10 août 2020 10:11 > To: Damjan Marion (damarion) > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Subject: Re:

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp19.08.2 crypto_ia32 do not support aes-gcm icv_size 8/12 crypto

2020-08-10 Thread 叶东岗
I get it, in _mm_movemask_epi8, (r == T) should be replaced with _mm_cmpeq_epi8 (r, T) /* check tag */ u16 tag_mask = tag_len ? (1 << tag_len) - 1 : 0x; r = _mm_loadu_si128 ((__m128i *) tag); if (_mm_movemask_epi8 (r == T) != tag_mask) {// what is

Re: [vpp-dev] #vpp-memif Send packets out on physical interface controlled by vpp(DPDK) once they are received through memif

2020-08-10 Thread Benoit Ganne (bganne) via lists.fd.io
> But I am having trouble figuring out routing or ABF in former case. Once I > send packet back to VPP after processing from my application, how VPP can > send it out on physical interface. I have two physical interfaces. > Normally packets flow between two using link routes automatically. Both >

Re: [vpp-dev] #vpp-memif Send packets out on physical interface controlled by vpp(DPDK) once they are received through memif

2020-08-10 Thread techiek7
[Edited Message Follows] Thanks. But I am having trouble figuring out routing or ABF in former case. Once I send packet back to VPP after processing from my application, how VPP can send it out on physical interface. I have two physical interfaces. Normally packets flow between two using link

Re: [vpp-dev] #vpp-memif Send packets out on physical interface controlled by vpp(DPDK) once they are received through memif

2020-08-10 Thread techiek7
Thanks. But I am having trouble figuring out routing or ABF in former case. Once I send packet back to VPP after processing from my application, how VPP can send it out on physical interface. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online

Re: [vpp-dev] #vpp-memif Send packets out on physical interface controlled by vpp(DPDK) once they are received through memif

2020-08-10 Thread Benoit Ganne (bganne) via lists.fd.io
> How do I send packets out on a physical interface after I received them > through libmemif in non-vpp application from VPP(DPDK)? Do I need to send > them back to vpp so that VPP can send them out on a physical interface. If the physical interface is managed by VPP, yes, as you cannot share