PTAL https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/36334
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 10:25 PM Pim van Pelt via lists.fd.io wrote:
> Hi Damjan,
>
> Just a quick note - 22.06 still has this regression
>
> 1: /home/pim/src/vpp/src/vlib/drop.c:77 (counter_index) assertion `ci <
> n->n_errors' fails
>
>
> Is a
Hi Damjan,
Just a quick note - 22.06 still has this regression
1: /home/pim/src/vpp/src/vlib/drop.c:77 (counter_index) assertion `ci <
n->n_errors' fails
Is a reasonable fix for this seeing to it that the ASSERT here returns NULL
instead and the two call sites in L95, L224 become tolerant of
Hi Gabi,
It looks like aesni_mb and aesni_gcm are disabled in VPP's DPDK build
configuration. see build/external/packages/dpdk.mk. You would probably need
to remove those from DPDK_DRIVERS_DISABLED and rebuild if you want to use
them. That said, I doubt you would see much improvement as a result
Hi Wanghe,
The only api bindings supported today are c, python and golang. Maybe somebody
familiar with the jvpp code can help you out but otherwise I’d recommend to
switch if possible.
Regards,
Florin
> On Jun 3, 2022, at 7:55 AM, NUAA无痕 wrote:
>
> Hi, florin
>
> About this question, i
Hi, florin
About this question, i compare c++ code with jvpp code， then i found that
jvpp maybe have a bug and even if update vpp also cannot resolve it
jvpp code according to vpp version 1901, that has jvpp example
Hi,
I am a beginner in VPP and DPDK stuff, I am trying to create a high performance
AWS VM which should do IPSec tunneling.
The IPSEc traffic is running well, but I can not exceed 8Gb traffic throughput
and I can not convince VPP to beat the "ip xfrm" in terms of IPSec traffic
throughput.
