Hello!
I have a suggestion to add a feature to update NAT addresses VRF location when
the VRF on the interface has been changed.
I've prepared a patch with a test which does it and checks this behavior.
I want to push these changes, but want to ask first of your opinion.
Is it a good point to add
s
> steps.
> That should be fine for up to 4Tbps.
>
>
> On 27 Mar 2018, at 14:58, Dmitry Vakhrushev wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Changes in commit: 03f47f1e738051db1412a93c2b90a7426f81f648
>
>
> This commit provided new ethernet speeds which store as speed bit in a
&
Hi,
Changes in commit: 03f47f1e738051db1412a93c2b90a7426f81f648
This commit provided new ethernet speeds which store as speed bit in a
variable. And the current version of API for 'sw_interface_details' is not
correct for that changes.
Current variable in sw_interface_details API interface doesn
