Hi Ben,
Thanks for your reply. I agree with you, I will configure both host and vpp use
my agent.
But I am still alittle confused. As if you check the function
"tuntap_ip4_add_del_interface_address()" in tuntap.c. This function will be
called by ip4_add_del_interface_address_internal() in
Hi guys,
I modified the startup.conf and enabled the tuntap interface.
After vpp (vpp20.01) startup, it will create a tun interface named “vnet” in
host linux. If I add an ip address to the physical interface, the same ip
address will be added to vnet. But if I add an route entry, it will
t;Neale Ranns via lists.fd.io"
wrote:
Hi Jinlei,
Could you please send me a pcap capture of the grat-arp that VPP receives. Then
I can duplicate the case in the UT.
Thanks,
neale
From: on behalf of Jinlei Li
Date: Saturday 19 September 2020 at 11:56
To: "vpp-dev@lists.
, both the
same occurs on vpp.
Regards
Jinlei.
At 2020-09-21 22:39:46, "Neale Ranns via lists.fd.io"
wrote:
Hi Jinlei,
Could you please send me a pcap capture of the grat-arp that VPP receives. Then
I can duplicate the case in the UT.
Thanks,
neale
From: on behalf of Jin
Hi guys,
I am testing the Qos mark feature recently, my useage is like this: When I use
vpp to send a udp packet by a vlan sub-interface, I want to mark dscp and vlan
pri at the same time. So I create a qos egress map like this and qos mark the
output interface.
qos egress map id 0 [ip][0]=30
Hi guys,
During my test environment, I have two physical interfaces in the same
broadcast domain, and they are configured with IPs of different subnet.
I tried to ping 10.161.26.23 first, and I can see its’s mac address by “show ip
neighbor”
But if 10.161.26.23 send a gratuitous ARP
By the way, The application on Linux also can start a tcp connection or send
packet out first through veth and VPP, hope this scenario can also be satisfied.
At 2020-09-01 10:06:35, "Jinlei Li" wrote:
Dear VPP experts,
If we configure an IPV6 address on the physical port mana
Dear VPP experts,
If we configure an IPV6 address on the physical port managed by VPP, some
traffic to this IPV6 address should be handled by VPP, but some specified
traffic (use port + protocol type to identify, like ssh) need to be forwarded
to Linux kernel, I can use veth or tun/tap to
Hi,
I am trying to test vpp load balance for my scenario. I create two pairs of
veth on host linux, and connect vpp and two Nginx containers by them. A
physical NIC is used by VPP as eth0 , and I create a loopback interface
(loop0), finally I add the two host-interfaces and the loopback
