thernet0/a/0.10 up
When I sent ping from client with vlan 20, it didn't work correctly.
Another question, how can I see configuration of each sub-interface?
(show interface is not complete, it isn't shown vlan tag, protocol,
etc.)
Best Regards,
Juan Salmon.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Li
licitation checksum 0x88f1
target address :::c0a8:28fe
00:21:57:421995: error-drop
ip6-icmp-input: neighbor solicitations for unknown targets
Best Regards,
Juan Salmon.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#9704): https://lis
p
fib 0 entry 6
00:27:52:305572: ip4-mfib-forward-rpf
entry 6 1 Forward,
00:27:52:305572: ip4-drop
OSPF: 192.168.20.151 -> 224.0.0.5
tos 0xc0, ttl 1, length 64, checksum 0x6bc3
fragment id 0x979d
00:27:52:305574: error-drop
ip4-input: ip4 adjacency drop
Best Regards,
Best Regards,
Juan Salmon.
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
> Hi Juan,
>
>
>
> What do you mean by that? Do you have packet trace?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Matus
>
>
>
>
>
> *From
Hi,
Does nat64 support local ping? It's failed in my test.
Best Regards,
Juan Salmon.
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
/64
set int ip address GigabitEthernet0/5/0 192.168.5.2/24
ip route add ::/0 via 2002::1
set int nat64 in GigabitEthernet0/4/0
set int nat64 out GigabitEthernet0/5/0
nat64 add prefix 1:2:3::/96
nat64 add pool address 192.168.50.1 - 192.168.50.19
Best Regards,
Juan Salmon
,
Juan Salmon.
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Dave Barach (dbarach)
wrote:
> PMFJI, but we have organized schemes for capturing, serializing, and
> eventually displaying string data.
>
>
>
> Please note: a single "format" call will probably cost more than *the
> entir
u8 * err;
} * ed;
vlib_worker_thread_t * w = vlib_worker_threads + cpu_index;
ed = ELOG_TRACK_DATA (&vlib_global_main.elog_main, e,
w->elog_track);
ed->err = format (0,"%s", "This is a Test");
Cou
because of alignment offset.
Thanks
Juan
Best Regards,
Juan Salmon.
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Dave Barach (dbarach)
wrote:
> You’ll need to characterize what you’re seeing better than “multiple time
> slower” before it would be worth speculating on what’s going on.
>
>
>
&
Hi,
I compiled VPP with Dclib_vec64 option to have more than four Gigabyte heap
size.
It works correctly but multiple time slower than 32 bit version.
It seems that inserting data in hash tables caused this problem.
Is there any idea?
Best Regards,
Juan Salmon
Thanks Matus for your reply.
But I tested SNAT in 32 bit mode with the same number of users and it
worked 1000 times faster.
Best Regards,
Juan Salmon.
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
,
Juan Salmon.
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
tions
snat jvpp compilation failed: 2
Error: Could not find class file for 'io.fd.vpp.jvpp.snat.JVppSnatImpl'.
make: *** [snat/jvpp/io_fd_vpp_jvpp_snat_JVppSnatImpl.h] Error 1
Best Regards,
Juan Salmon.
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
ra/vppinfra/vec.c:59
#5 0x7ffdf53b105a in _vec_resize (data_align=8, header_bytes=0,
data_bytes=, length_increment=, v=) at /usr/include/vppinfra/vec.h:142
#6 clib_bitmap_set (value=1, i=2327873586176, ai=0x0) at
/usr/include/vppinfra/bitmap.h:177
Best Regards,
Juan Salmon.
Hi,
I want to know how to skip one or several features in a feature-arc?
Best Regards,
Juan Salmon.
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Hi every body,
I want to know if VPP supports dynamic routing?
I've downloaded and tried to compile VPP-Sandbox router plug in, but it
seems that the code is old and is not usable anymore.
Best Regards,
Juan Salmon.
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vp
out TenGigabitEthernet5/0/1
snat add address 10.0.30.2 - 10.0.30.254
Best Regards,
Juan Salmon.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Juan Salmon wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> *And cli config:*
> set int ip address TenGigabitEthernet5/0/0 16.0.0.2/24
> set int state TenGigabitEther
address 10.0.30.2 - 10.0.30.11
Best Regards,
Juan Salmon.
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
0
TenGigabitEthernet5/0/1 queue 0
Thread 2 (vpp_wk_1 at lcore 2):
TenGigabitEthernet5/0/0 queue 1
TenGigabitEthernet5/0/1 queue 1
Best Regards,
Juan Salmon.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
&g
Best Regards,
Juan Salmon.
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
/longjmp.S:110
#16 0x7ffbb7d58c00 in ?? ()
#17 0x0041bae7 in eal_thread_loop (arg=) at
/root/vpp/build-root/build-vpp-native/dpdk/dpdk-16.11/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_thread.c:184
#18 0x in ?? ()
Thanks for your response,
Best Regards,
Juan Salmon
Hello guys,
I ran the new commit of snat that supports multi-thread. but it failed at
ip and port allocation function in multi-thread mode.
I don't know if I missed some configuration or there is another problem?!
Best Regards,
Juan Salmon
___
vp
22 matches
Mail list logo