Hi Neale.
Yes, that fixes the issue with the duplicates.
Charles
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 03:04 PM, Neale Ranns wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Charles,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Does this fix it :
>
>
>
> https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/18944/ ( https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/18944/ )
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Thank you for the response Dave.
Any thoughts regarding the duplication of frames in the tx pcap?
Charles
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12796): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12796
Mute This Topic:
Hello all.
I am using VPP 19.04 with DPDK 19.02.
When I start a pcap trace on physical or tap interfaces, pcap trace status
reports it as 'local0'.
vpp# pcap rx trace on max 500 intfc tap0 file subif-rx.pcap
pcap rx capture on...
vpp# pcap rx trace status
max is 500 for interface local0 to file
Hello all.
I intend to evaluate VPP and Cisco TRex on some hardware I already own that
apparently does not have h/w AES though SSE4.2 and AVX2 are present.
I have no intention of doing IPsec or any crypto operations. So is it possible
to build VPP, DPDK and Cisco TRex without h/w AES?
Hello all.
I am attempting to run VPP in LXD managed containers with memif interfaces to
the host VPP.
However I am finding that the VPP instances in the containers "own" a CPU core
apiece, which I thought should happen only with the host VPP due to the use of
PMD drivers.
Is there any way to
