Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] Interface Mib II counters

2018-07-20 Thread Ole Troan
Hi David, > We are starting to use the new api, it looks good, thanks for this. > Documentation would be very appreciated Splendid. Any suggestions for improvements, please let us know. > Any idea how much more evolving it’s going to do? The base stuff should be pretty stable. So the evolving

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] Interface Mib II counters

2018-07-19 Thread Dave Barach via Lists.Fd.Io
To: Ole Troan Cc: Ray Kinsella ; Rubina Bianchi ; John DeNisco (jdenisco) ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] Interface Mib II counters We are starting to use the new api, it looks good, thanks for this. Documentation would be very appreciated Any idea how much more

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] Interface Mib II counters

2018-07-19 Thread Dave Cornejo
We are starting to use the new api, it looks good, thanks for this. Documentation would be very appreciated Any idea how much more evolving it’s going to do? Is there any impact on performance of vector processing from using it? Dave c On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:04 AM Ole Troan wrote: > Hi

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] Interface Mib II counters

2018-07-19 Thread Ray Kinsella
Perfect - thanks Ole, I will look out for this. We get questions on this pretty regularly, so having some supporting documentation would be a huge help. Ray K On 19/07/2018 03:02, Ole Troan wrote: Hi Ray, This looks like something that really deserves to be documented, _particularly_ the

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] Interface Mib II counters

2018-07-19 Thread Ole Troan
Hi Ray, > This looks like something that really deserves to be documented, > _particularly_ the stats api & client? Yes. Very much so. > Has anyone written anything here that we can use? Not yet. The feature is somewhat experimental. And there are still a few bits missing with regards to the c