; tpyed by my fat tumhbs
>
> --
> *From:* Venkat
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 12, 2020 5:41:42 PM
> *To:* Andrew Yourtchenko
> *Cc:* Neale Ranns (nranns) ; Balaji Venkatraman
> (balajiv) ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> *Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] ABF and ACL co-existence on an Interfac
Make sense!
Thank much, Neale.
--
Regards,
Balaji.
From: "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 at 10:20 AM
To: "Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv)"
Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , Venkat
, Andrew Yourtchenko
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] ABF and ACL co-
, to
forwarding.
/neale
tpyed by my fat tumhbs
From: Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv)
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 5:08:51 PM
To: Neale Ranns (nranns)
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io ; Venkat
; Andrew Yourtchenko
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] ABF and ACL co-existence on an Interface
ich traffic it deals with - but that’s it.
>>
>>
>> +1 [ VENKAT] I expected the same behavior but it doesn't look like it.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:33 AM Andrew Yourtchenko
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11 Aug 2020, at 17:3
t , Andrew Yourtchenko
, "Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv)"
Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] ABF and ACL co-existence on an Interface
IMO it's reasonable to use ACL and ABF on the same interface as they provide
independent functions, especially when they
reasonable to use ACL and ABF on the same interface as they
>>>> provide independent functions, especially when they are matching against
>>>> different criteria.
>>>
>>> +1. Those two are orthogonal functions. ABF uses the acl as a service infra
>>> to
> --
>> *From:* vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Balaji
>> Venkatraman via lists.fd.io
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 11, 2020 4:08:56 PM
>> *To:* Venkat ; Andrew Yourtchenko <
>> ayour...@gmail.com>
>> *Cc:* vpp-dev@lists.f
gt; Venkatraman via lists.fd.io
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 11, 2020 4:08:56 PM
> *To:* Venkat ; Andrew Yourtchenko <
> ayour...@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> *Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] ABF and ACL co-existence on an Interface
>
> Hi Venkat,
> Ideally,
h?
>
>
> Thanks!
> —
> Regards,
> Balaji.
>
> Get Outlook for iOS
> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Venkat
>
> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2020 11:52:46 PM
> To: Andrew Yourtchenko
> Cc: Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv) ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
>
>
fat tumhbs
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Balaji Venkatraman
via lists.fd.io
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 4:08:56 PM
To: Venkat ; Andrew Yourtchenko
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] ABF and ACL co-existence on an Interface
Hi Venkat
pp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Venkat
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2020 11:52:46 PM
To: Andrew Yourtchenko
Cc: Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv) ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] ABF and ACL co-existence on an Interface
Hi Andrew,
Here are a couple of test scenarios where I observed vpp crash
ace. I agree, in any case, it should not result in a
>>> crash.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> Venkat
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 9:59 AM Balaji Venkatraman via lists.fd.io
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Venkat,
>>
t in a crash.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> Venkat
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 9:59 AM Balaji Venkatraman via lists.fd.io
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Venkat,
>
;
>> On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 9:59 AM Balaji Venkatraman via lists.fd.io
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Venkat,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Underlying the ABF is another ACL. When we attach an ABF to the
>>> interface, the ACL it inherits gets applie
gt;
>>>>
>>>> Underlying the ABF is another ACL. When we attach an ABF to the interface,
>>>> the ACL it inherits gets applied to the interface. Not sure if another ACL
>>>> independent of the above can be attached to the same interface. But, in
>>
be attached to the same interface.
>> But, in any case, it should not crash
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Balaji.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: * on behalf of "vdabb...@infoblox.com"
ied to the interface. Not sure if another ACL
>> independent of the above can be attached to the same interface. But, in any
>> case, it should not crash
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Balaji.
>>
>
*From: * on behalf of "vdabb...@infoblox.com" <
> vdabb...@infoblox.com>
> *Date: *Friday, August 7, 2020 at 9:36 AM
> *To: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
> *Subject: *[vpp-dev] ABF and ACL co-existence on an Interface
>
>
>
> Hello,
> Experimenting
.
From: on behalf of "vdabb...@infoblox.com"
Date: Friday, August 7, 2020 at 9:36 AM
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Subject: [vpp-dev] ABF and ACL co-existence on an Interface
Hello,
Experimenting ABF in VPP. Had a question regarding the co-existence of ABF and
ACL on an inte
Hello,
Experimenting ABF in VPP. Had a question regarding the co-existence of ABF and
ACL on an interface.
Seems like we can either attach ABF or ACL to an interface and not both.
Is this the behavior or am I missing anything?
When I try to install ABF rule on an interface that already has ACL
20 matches
Mail list logo
