> I guess I should also modify the value of "DPDK RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM" but
> I don't know how I can do it ? Indeed, I can't find where this variable is
> defined.
You should be able to change it here:
https://git.fd.io/vpp/tree/build/external/packages/dpdk.mk#n14
Best
ben
Ah indeed, I missed that, sorry! Thanks! :-)
--a
> On 18 Jul 2021, at 16:59, Damjan Marion wrote:
>
>
>
> That was already suggested to Jerome, see his first email in this thread.
>
> —
> Damjan
>
>
>>> On 18.07.2021., at 16:05, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote:
>>>
>> Naive question: if
Hello Benoit,
Thank you for your answer about buffer allocation in batches, my solution is
way more efficient now.
However, I still want to try to change the value of the " PRE_DATA_SIZE " cmake
variable to see how it behaves with a greater value (i.e 256 instead of 128).
To do so, I
> On 15.07.2021., at 18:53, jerome.bay...@student.uliege.be wrote:
>
> Dear vpp-dev,
>
> I'm trying to do some IPv6 in IPv6 encapsulation with no tunnel configuration.
>
> The objective is to encapsulate the received packet in an other IPv6 packet
> that will also "contain" a Hop-by-hop
Hi Jerome,
> However, when I tried to perform some performance tests I was quite
> disappointed by the results : the buffer allocation for each packet is not
> efficient at all. My question is then : Is there any way to increase the
> performances ? To allocate buffers, I use the function
Dear vpp-dev,
I'm trying to do some IPv6 in IPv6 encapsulation with no tunnel configuration.
The objective is to encapsulate the received packet in an other IPv6 packet
that will also "contain" a Hop-by-hop extension header. In summary, the
structure of the final packet will look like this :
