Re: [vpp-dev] RFC7755 implementation in VPP

2020-02-04 Thread Daniel Bernier
Yes, stateless but it can use RFC6052 to map IPv4 address ranges into a specific translated prefix On 2020-02-04, 10:20 AM, "otr...@employees.org" wrote: Daniel, > SIIT-DC is actually the reverse, static IPv4 to IPv6 mapping Goes both ways right and stateless.

Re: [vpp-dev] RFC7755 implementation in VPP

2020-02-04 Thread Ole Troan
Daniel, > SIIT-DC is actually the reverse, static IPv4 to IPv6 mapping Goes both ways right and stateless. You just want a: 1.1.1.1 <--> 2001:db8::1 mapping right. No dynamic bindings. Cheers, Ole > > On 2020-02-04, 8:47 AM, "otr...@employees.org" wrote: > >Daniel, > > >> Is

Re: [vpp-dev] RFC7755 implementation in VPP

2020-02-04 Thread Daniel Bernier
SIIT-DC is actually the reverse, static IPv4 to IPv6 mapping On 2020-02-04, 8:47 AM, "otr...@employees.org" wrote: Daniel, > Is there a working implementation of SIIT-DC (RFC7755) in VPP ? And if so, any reference configurations ? There's been so many NAT features

Re: [vpp-dev] RFC7755 implementation in VPP

2020-02-04 Thread Ole Troan
Daniel, > Is there a working implementation of SIIT-DC (RFC7755) in VPP ? And if so, > any reference configurations ? There's been so many NAT features that I can't quite remember. SIIT-DC is just 1:1 NAT64 mapping, right? Check out if it works: https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/NAT#Stateful_NAT64

[vpp-dev] RFC7755 implementation in VPP

2020-02-04 Thread Daniel Bernier
Hello VPP dev community, Is there a working implementation of SIIT-DC (RFC7755) in VPP ? And if so, any reference configurations ? Thanks, Daniel Bernier ? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#15330):