Re: [vpp-dev] Ubuntu1604 merge job is broken

2019-07-19 Thread Yohan Pipereau (ypiperea) via Lists.Fd.Io
rguments macro not to break distribution using cmake earlier than 3.5. Yohan > -Original Message- > From: Andrew  Yourtchenko > Sent: vendredi 19 juillet 2019 23:28 > To: Yohan Pipereau (ypiperea) > Cc: Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) > ; vpp-

Re: [vpp-dev] Ubuntu1604 merge job is broken

2019-07-19 Thread Andrew Yourtchenko
aging rather than vom. > > Yohan > >> -Original Message- >> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Andrew >> Yourtchenko >> Sent: vendredi 19 juillet 2019 20:42 >> To: Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) >> >>

Re: [vpp-dev] Ubuntu1604 merge job is broken

2019-07-19 Thread Yohan Pipereau (ypiperea) via Lists.Fd.Io
vendredi 19 juillet 2019 20:42 > To: Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) > > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Ubuntu1604 merge job is broken > > I reproduced the problem on 16.04, somehow the name is goofed - it has > “Linux” in the pack

Re: [vpp-dev] Ubuntu1604 merge job is broken

2019-07-19 Thread Andrew Yourtchenko
I reproduced the problem on 16.04, somehow the name is goofed - it has “Linux” in the package name rather than the standard architecture name. I suspect vom isn’t really arch-agnostic, so probably it is not a nice idea to name it this way :-) Interestingly building on 18.04 the name does

[vpp-dev] Ubuntu1604 merge job is broken

2019-07-19 Thread Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) via Lists.Fd.Io
Paul has already commented [0] on this, hopefully my subject draws more attention. Basically, packagecould does not like the look of ubuntu1604 VOM package, leading not only to missing VOM package, but also other packages unlucky enough to come after VOM in upload order. This includes packages