On 6/22/20, Neale Ranns (nranns) wrote:
> Doing only new functionality that the point of introducing the new API is
> good because it ensures no-harm-done to all tested functionality of the v1
> API. However, users of the new API will [likely?] use the v2 API for old and
> new functions, but
From: on behalf of Andrew Yourtchenko
Date: Thursday 18 June 2020 at 17:58
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Cc: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP API CRC compatibility check process in checkstyle
merged and active
Hi Neale,
On 18 Jun 2020, at 17:11, Neale Ranns (nranns) wrote:
> Cc: Neale Ranns (nranns) ; vpp-dev
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP API CRC compatibility check process in checkstyle
> merged and active
>
> Hi Balaji,
>
> Yeah that was what I was thinking, though weekly ain’t good enough - one
> would have to run coverage report before and af
pp-dev@lists.fd.io>> on behalf of Andrew
Yourtchenko mailto:ayour...@gmail.com>>
Date: Thursday, June 18, 2020 at 8:58 AM
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" mailto:nra...@cisco.com>>
Cc: vpp-dev mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP API CRC compatibi
>
> From: on behalf of Andrew Yourtchenko
>
> Date: Thursday, June 18, 2020 at 8:58 AM
> To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
> Cc: vpp-dev
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP API CRC compatibility check process in checkstyle
> merged and active
>
> Hi Neale,
: Thursday, June 18, 2020 at 8:58 AM
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Cc: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP API CRC compatibility check process in checkstyle
merged and active
Hi Neale,
On 18 Jun 2020, at 17:11, Neale Ranns (nranns) wrote:
Hi Andrew,
A couple of questions?
Absolutely!
Hi Neale,
> On 18 Jun 2020, at 17:11, Neale Ranns (nranns) wrote:
>
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> A couple of questions?
Absolutely! That’s how we improve it! Thanks a lot for the questions ! Replies
inline:
>
> Firstly, about unit testing aka make test. This is the salient passage in
> your
Hi Andrew,
A couple of questions?
Firstly, about unit testing aka make test. This is the salient passage in your
guide:
"foo_message_v2 is tested in "make test" to the same extent as the
foo_message"
IMHO "to the same extent" implies everywhere v1 is used v2 should now be used
in its place.
Resending with the address that is subscribed to the list, as i didn’t notice
my MUA using the wrong one.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Andrew Yourtchenko (ayourtch)"
> Date: 17 June 2020 at 20:47:51 CEST
> To: vpp-dev
> Cc: Ole Troan , "Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON
> TECH SRO at
