t;dmar...@me.com <mailto:dmar...@me.com>" > <mailto:dmar...@me.com>>
>> Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 at 7:48 AM
>> To: Joshua Moore mailto:j...@jcm.me>>
>> Cc: "Benoit Ganne (bganne)" mailto:bga...@cisco.com>>,
>> "vpp-dev@
rds,
> Yichen
>
> From: on behalf of "Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io"
>
> Reply-To: "dmar...@me.com"
> Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 at 7:48 AM
> To: Joshua Moore
> Cc: "Benoit Ganne (bganne)" , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
>
> Subje
s if you run stress-test the CPU eg.
> ~# stress-ng --matrix 0 -t 1m
>
> Best
> ben
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joshua Moore mailto:j...@jcm.me>>
> > Sent: mardi 29 septembre 2020 12:07
> > To: Benoit Ganne (bganne) mailto:bga...@cisco.com&g
> Of course there's a PCI switch. My main purpose of leveraging SR-IOV with
> VF allocation is to allow the internal eswitch on the Intel NIC to handle
> switching in hardware
A PCIe switch is a different beast than the internal "Ethernet switch" you are
mentioning.
The PCIe topology in your
:07
> > To: Benoit Ganne (bganne)
> > Cc: Damjan Marion ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP on ESXI with i40evf (SR-IOV Passthrough)
> Driver
> >
> > Hello Ben,
> >
> > echo 1 | sudo tee /sys/module/vfio/parameters/enable_unsafe_noiommu_
Re: [vpp-dev] VPP on ESXI with i40evf (SR-IOV Passthrough) Driver
>
> Hello Ben,
>
> echo 1 | sudo tee /sys/module/vfio/parameters/enable_unsafe_noiommu_mode
> sudo dpdk-devbind --bind=vfio-pci :13:00.0
>
>
> The above commands successfully resulted in vfio-pci driver b
septembre 2020 00:26
> > To: Joshua Moore
> > Cc: Damjan Marion ; Benoit Ganne (bganne)
> > ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP on ESXI with i40evf (SR-IOV Passthrough)
> Driver
> >
> > Sorry, previous dmesg was greped on my VMXNET3 adapter,
ts.fd.io
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP on ESXI with i40evf (SR-IOV Passthrough) Driver
>
> Sorry, previous dmesg was greped on my VMXNET3 adapter, not the i40evf.
> Correct dmesg:
>
> jmoore@test:~$ dmesg | grep :13:00.0
> [0.259249] pci :13:00.0: [8086:154c] type
gt;>> > assigned to the VM and not try to setup a new VF?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Thanks!
>>> >
>>> > -Josh
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 2:40 AM Benoit Ganne (bganne) <
>>> bga...@cisco.com
>>&g
t need to setup the VFs
>> if it is already correctly setup by ESXI.
>> Just create the AVF interface directly by specifying the VF PCI address.
>>
>> ben
>>
>> > -----Original Message-
>> > From: Joshua Moore
>> > Sent: lundi 28 septembre 2020
ystem.
> >
> > Best
> > ben
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
> > <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> > d...@lists.fd.io
bganne)
> > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP on ESXI with i40evf (SR-IOV Passthrough)
> Driver
> >
> > Hello Benoit,
> >
> > Looking at the script for AVF, it states:
> >
> > # Setup one VF on PF :3b:00.0 and assign MAC ad
020 17:48
> To: Benoit Ganne (bganne)
> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP on ESXI with i40evf (SR-IOV Passthrough) Driver
>
> Hello Benoit,
>
> Looking at the script for AVF, it states:
>
> # Setup one VF on PF :3b:00.0 and assign MAC address
&g
; > To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > Subject: [vpp-dev] VPP on ESXI with i40evf (SR-IOV Passthrough) Driver
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is there any support for VPP to talk directly to ESXI-assigned VFs via
> SR-
> > IOV? I saw the AVF plugin but I don't want VPP t
system.
Best
ben
> -Original Message-
> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of j...@jcm.me
> Sent: lundi 28 septembre 2020 01:29
> To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> Subject: [vpp-dev] VPP on ESXI with i40evf (SR-IOV Passthrough) Driver
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there any suppo
Hello,
Is there any support for VPP to talk directly to ESXI-assigned VFs via SR-IOV?
I saw the AVF plugin but I don't want VPP to control the whole PF (physical
NIC) but rather would like to have ESXI control the mapping of VFs (SR-IOV) and
VPP (or DPDK) consume the VF natively in the VM so
16 matches
Mail list logo
