By the way, I prefer to have default values
defined already in .api.json files,
for example like this [6];
assuming it does not break language bindings.
That way we will have just one kind of backward compatibility,
so it will be easier to decide API version bumps.
Vratko.
[6] https://gerrit.fd
ev
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: [vpp-dev] backward PAPI-compatibility
Hello VPP reviewers.
When adding a comment to API flag day document,
I have stumbled upon an idea,
that is somewhat larger than the document itself.
It has to do with a weaker form of VPP backward compatibility,
specific to clien
Hello VPP reviewers.
When adding a comment to API flag day document,
I have stumbled upon an idea,
that is somewhat larger than the document itself.
It has to do with a weaker form of VPP backward compatibility,
specific to clients using Python API (PAPI).
Here is the relevant part of the commen
