From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Damjan Marion via
lists.fd.io
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2020 1:29 PM
To: Jon Loeliger via lists.fd.io
Cc: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] move to clang-format
On 17.12.2020., at 19:06, Jon Loeliger via lists.fd.io
mailto:jdl=netgate
>
> On 17.12.2020., at 19:06, Jon Loeliger via lists.fd.io
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 6:15 AM Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was playing a bit with clang-format as replacement to gnu indent which we
>> use today[1].
>>
>> While it is impos
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 6:15 AM Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was playing a bit with clang-format as replacement to gnu indent which
> we use today[1].
>
> While it is impossible to render exact same result like gnu indent, good
> thing is that clang-format can be used only o
+1.
/neale
From: on behalf of Florin Coras
Date: Wednesday 16 December 2020 at 16:14
To: Damjan Marion
Cc: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] move to clang-format
+1
Florin
On Dec 16, 2020, at 6:12 AM, Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io<http://lists.fd.io>
mailto:dmarion=me@lists
Ganne (bganne) wrote:
>>
>> Sounds good to me, clang-format should be more consistent than indent...
>>
>> ben
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Damjan Marion
>>> via lists.fd.io
Yes please!
De : au nom de "Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io"
Répondre à : "dmar...@me.com"
Date : mercredi 16 décembre 2020 à 15:12
À : vpp-dev
Objet : Re: [vpp-dev] move to clang-format
Any feedback?
Any good reason not to do the switch now when we have stable/2
@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Damjan
Marion via lists.fd.io
Sent: dimanche 13 décembre 2020 13:16
To: vpp-dev
Subject: [vpp-dev] move to clang-format
Hi,
I was playing a bit with clang-format as replacement to gnu indent
which we use today[1].
While it is impossible to render exact same result like
Seems like a good time to flip the switch... Thanks... Dave
-Original Message-
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Damjan Marion via
lists.fd.io
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2020 9:12 AM
To: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] move to clang-format
Any feedback?
Any good reason not to
nal Message-
>> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Damjan Marion
>> via lists.fd.io
>> Sent: dimanche 13 décembre 2020 13:16
>> To: vpp-dev
>> Subject: [vpp-dev] move to clang-format
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was playing a bit with cl
Sounds good to me, clang-format should be more consistent than indent...
ben
> -Original Message-
> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Damjan Marion
> via lists.fd.io
> Sent: dimanche 13 décembre 2020 13:16
> To: vpp-dev
> Subject: [vpp-dev] move to clang-format
> On Dec 13, 2020, at 7:15 AM, Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I was playing a bit with clang-format as replacement to gnu indent which we
> use today[1].
>
> While it is impossible to render exact same result like gnu indent, good
> thing is that clang-format can be
fd.io
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2020 7:16 AM
To: vpp-dev
Subject: [vpp-dev] move to clang-format
Hi,
I was playing a bit with clang-format as replacement to gnu indent which we use
today[1].
While it is impossible to render exact same result like gnu indent, good thing
is that clang-format c
Hi,
I was playing a bit with clang-format as replacement to gnu indent which we use
today[1].
While it is impossible to render exact same result like gnu indent, good thing
is that clang-format can be used only on lines which are changed in the diff so
no major reformat is needed. My patch de
13 matches
Mail list logo
