than 1460 bytes automatically.
Best Regards.
Jie HU
hujie@chinatelecom.cn
From: Yang, Zhiyong
Date: 2018-09-27 15:37
To: Ole Troan
CC: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Kinsella, Ray; hujie@chinatelecom.cn; Liu, Frank M
Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] one question about IP fragment
Ole, thanks so much for
ct: Re: [vpp-dev] one question about IP fragment
>
> > Got it.
> > Do you have plan to support this DPDK feature in VPP? Or always support VPP
> native implementation Only in future.
>
> There are no plans as far as I’m aware.
> I don’t see any reason to do the fragment
> Got it.
> Do you have plan to support this DPDK feature in VPP? Or always support VPP
> native implementation Only in future.
There are no plans as far as I’m aware.
I don’t see any reason to do the fragmentation with DPDK code over VPP.
Unless there is significant performance difference. Great
..@chinatelecom.cn; Liu, Frank M
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] one question about IP fragment
>
> Zhiyong,
>
> >> The next steps for tunnels, to help avoid fragmentation is to add
> >> some sort of tunnel path MTU discovery.
> >
> > It looks very i
point in
ip{4,6}_path_mtu_check()
Cheers,
Ole
> From: Yang, Zhiyong
> Date: 2018-09-27 15:37
> To: Ole Troan
> CC: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Kinsella, Ray; hujie@chinatelecom.cn; Liu, Frank
> M
> Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] one question about IP fragment
> Ole, thanks so much for
Zhiyong,
>> The next steps for tunnels, to help avoid fragmentation is to add some sort
>> of
>> tunnel path MTU discovery.
>
> It looks very interesting and helpful. And I'm looking forward to seeing it.
>
> However, we fail to send big packet greater than MTU now, for example,
> We have MTU
ge-
> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Ole Troan
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 7:06 PM
> To: Yang, Zhiyong
> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Kinsella, Ray
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] one question about IP fragment
>
> Zhiyong,
>
> &
Zhiyong,
> When I use vxlan in both VM and physical machine , packet
> drop issue is come across, after setting VPP MTU = 1600, this issue will
> disappear. As we all know, some of routes on the network doesn’t support
> more than 1518 bytes packet.
> Should I try to use IP fr
Hi Ole, VPP maintainers,
When I use vxlan in both VM and physical machine , packet drop
issue is come across, after setting VPP MTU = 1600, this issue will disappear.
As we all know, some of routes on the network doesn't support more than 1518
bytes packet.
Should I try to us
