Thanks Benoit and Neale.
I used loopback interfaces, but since they are in different VRFs I couldn't
establish a L3 connection between them. I will try pipe interfaces.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#22419): https://lists.fd.io/g/v
I’d suggest a pipe, each end can be in a different VRF. See
src/scripts/vnet/ipsec for a config example.
/neale
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Benoit Ganne
(bganne) via lists.fd.io
Date: Thursday, 5 January 2023 at 00:18
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] veth
> Hi, I am looking for veth pair alternative in VPP. I want to pass traffics
> between two VRFs and I want them to be processed as input packets to an
> interface( to use NAT or other ip features), so route leakage is not gonna
> help. Also, since I'm using one instance of VPP with multiple VRFs, u
Hi,
I am looking for veth pair alternative in VPP. I want to pass traffics between
two VRFs and I want them to be processed as input packets to an interface( to
use NAT or other ip features), so route leakage is not gonna help. Also, since
I'm using one instance of VPP with multiple VRFs, using
