Hello,
I had the 2.4.22 kernel source so I just downloaded the patch to 2.4.23.
I applied the patch-2.4.23 to the linux-2.4.22 source tree, renamed it
to linux-2.4.23 and made a symbolic link to linux, then applied the
2.4.23 owl patch, which went ok, followed by patch-2.2.23-vs1.22 .diff,
with r
On Thursday 18 December 2003 16:53, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 04:41:15PM +0100, Bert De Vuyst wrote:
> > I did have a similar problem here. Running 2.4.22-vs1.00,
> > I could run the daemons on the host system without using chbind.
> > (the standard debian startup scripts)
> >
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 01:25:07PM +0100, Bert De Vuyst wrote:
> On Thursday 18 December 2003 16:53, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 04:41:15PM +0100, Bert De Vuyst wrote:
> > > I did have a similar problem here. Running 2.4.22-vs1.00,
> > > I could run the daemons on the host sys
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 03:35:15PM +0700, John Francis Lee wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had the 2.4.22 kernel source so I just downloaded the patch to 2.4.23.
>
> I applied the patch-2.4.23 to the linux-2.4.22 source tree, renamed it
> to linux-2.4.23 and made a symbolic link to linux, then applied the
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 04:24:56AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
...
> sure not, but gettimeofday for example, will
> return the current time, and this usually does
> not need an architecture specific interface
glibc
> (for sure it will require an arch specific
> implementation ;)
possible a diff
> > my test setup:
> > server machine1 with a virtual server machine2 running on op of it.
> > Both running debian 3.0
>
> okay, lets use a simpler terminology
>
> you have a 'host' which runs debian 3.0 and contains
> several 'vservers' or 'vps', again with debian 3.0
yes
> the host has running
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 09:11:34AM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 04:24:56AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> ...
>
> That should be part of the patch to enable vserver.
>
> > > BTW, I visited http://www.linux-vserver.org/ and didn't feel
> > > I understood why it's more use
All,
I am trying to get NFS (and autofs) to work on my VSERVER setup. I believe this
getting blocked by a "capability" or
2. Does anyone have instructions on how to get this to work?
Thanks
Jim
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
> I am trying to get NFS (and autofs) to work on my VSERVER setup.
> I believe this getting blocked by a "capability" or 2. Does anyone have
> instructions on how to get this to work?
http://www.paul.sladen.org/vserver/faq/#nfs
BTW, if anyone /did/ ge
Paul,
Thanks for the quick response. the premounting idea does work. I would like to get
the autofs stuff working but
think it is a bigger task than I am up to for now.
Another question:
in my host-server daemon.log file I am getting the following messages:
portmap[15982]: connect from 1
I've been working on getting the linux-vservers patch working with a ck
+ grsecurity patched kernel (maintained on this site:
http://www.plumlocosoft.com/kernel/). The CK patchset is a set of
patches for preemption, a new kernel scheduler (I believe a backport of
some of the stuff in 2.6, plus oth
Anyone attempted getting XFree86 working inside a vserver? Anyone
succeeded? I can't see why this shouldn't work, so I'm curious if it's
been tried.
l8r,
Liam
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vser
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 05:36:58PM +0100, Bert De Vuyst wrote:
>
> > > my test setup:
> > > server machine1 with a virtual server machine2 running on op of it.
> > > Both running debian 3.0
> >
> > okay, lets use a simpler terminology
> >
> > you have a 'host' which runs debian 3.0 and contains
>
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:44:39AM -0800, Liam Helmer wrote:
> I've been working on getting the linux-vservers patch working with a ck
> + grsecurity patched kernel (maintained on this site:
> http://www.plumlocosoft.com/kernel/). The CK patchset is a set of
> patches for preemption, a new kernel
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:14:47AM -0800, Liam Helmer wrote:
> Anyone attempted getting XFree86 working inside a vserver? Anyone
> succeeded? I can't see why this shouldn't work, so I'm curious if it's
> been tried.
to do what exactly?
best,
Herbert
> l8r,
> Liam
>
> ___
Awsome! I look forward to testing it out for you.
Well, I won't worry about it too much then -> I'm sure you're way more
qualified at this than I am .
l8r,
Liam
On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 12:03, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> I'm working on a port to ck1, and I guess it will
> be available soon for vs1.3.x
Basically having a desktop box that's running inside a vserver context
-> server and client. I have nefarious purposes for this... I've already
got it running inside a chroot with grsecurity, and that works fine.
I've even redirected hotplug messages, so USB cameras , printers and
such work, and I'
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 01:20:35PM -0800, Liam Helmer wrote:
> Basically having a desktop box that's running inside a vserver context
> -> server and client. I have nefarious purposes for this... I've already
> got it running inside a chroot with grsecurity, and that works fine.
> I've even redirec
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 06:03:51PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> heard of it for HPUX, and it seems that XEN
> is somewhat compareable to that, but that didn't
> answer my question: are they available for Linux
> or 'just' for HPUX?
http://www.hp.com/products1/unix/operating/manageability/partiti
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 06:51:21PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 06:03:51PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > heard of it for HPUX, and it seems that XEN
> > is somewhat compareable to that, but that didn't
> > answer my question: are they available for Linux
> > or 'just' f
Hi!
just wanted to find out how far the rabbit hole goes ...
browsing the source, I found the folowing
locations for possible s_info races ...
forget_original_parent()
goodness()
schedule()
update_process_times()
vc_new_s_context()
and of course similar is true for ip_info :(
there are two 'g
22 matches
Mail list logo
