Thanks again.
I don't have a dpkg command.
It's beginning to appear that this package requires Debian to work
correctly?
On à., 2003-12-23 at 21:35, Paul Sladen wrote:
> On 23 Dec 2003, John Francis Lee wrote:
>
> Hello John,
>
> This isn't specific to vserver, this is a general APT question
On 23 Dec 2003, John Francis Lee wrote:
Hello John,
This isn't specific to vserver, this is a general APT question.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# apt-get -y upgrade
Have you done `apt-get update' to update the package database before trying
to do an `upgrade' ?
> You might want to run `apt-get -f
Hello again,
I ran apt-get update :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# apt-get -y upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
apt: Depends: libelf.so.0
bind-utils: Dep
Merry Xmas and a Happy New Year to everybody !!!
--
regards,
Georges Toth
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:48:08PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 08:35:36PM -, Lu?s Miguel Silva wrote:
> >Hello all,
> >
> >I know the do_brk vulnerability is "a thing of the past" but, I just
> >tried out the exploit on one of my vservers just to see wh
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 09:44:52AM +0100, Martin List-Petersen wrote:
> Archives are complete, headers are filteret. Monthly split will follow.
thanks for all your help,
merry xmas,
Herbert
> Regards,
> Martin List-Petersen
> martin at list-petersen dot se
> --
> Q:Where's the Lone Ranger ta
Right. Did that. Thanks.
On à., 2003-12-23 at 16:48, James Noble wrote:
> You should also adjust the filename that you download,
>
> ftp://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/redhat/8.0/apt/apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr0.rh80.1.i386.rpm
>
> is the rh8.0 version
>
>
> James
> *** REPLY SEPARATOR *
am i supposed to use bot these patches? if so in what order, if it matters?
patch-2.4.23-vs1.20.diff
patch-2.4.23-vs1.20-q0.12.diff
I ask because i have been having trouble when i try to compile using both of them in
this order. and im tired so going to bed.
James
Well if you use it on rh7.3 with no ill effects it will probably work
for me as well.
I have small bandwidth and must wait for night time to do the upgrade.
I'll let you know how things work out.
Thanks again for all your help.
On à., 2003-12-23 at 15:48, James Noble wrote:
> Hello, Yes it was
You should also adjust the filename that you download,
ftp://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/redhat/8.0/apt/apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr0.rh80.1.i386.rpm
is the rh8.0 version
James
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 12/23/2003 at 4:33 PM John Francis Lee wrote:
>Well if you use it on rh7.3 with
Hello, Yes it was a debian tool, I just like it, I have been using it on many servers
(we have more than 300 of them here) and never had a problem with the RPM db, If you
want to use something else instead, by all means, go ahead, and post your adaptaion of
the instructions to the wiki.
James
11 matches
Mail list logo
