[Vserver] Network support

2004-03-01 Thread Thomas Gelf
Hi all, what about offering the vserver user (=administrator) to select between two possible ways of using networking: - first, the traditional way: interface aliases, allowing maximum per- formance with the limitation that vserver's root should either be very trustful or "a little bit" limited i

Re: [Vserver] sometimes vserver do not ping

2004-03-01 Thread Gebhardt Thomas
On Friday 27 February 2004 16:28, Herbert Poetzl wrote: Hi, > > 3: eth1: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 > > link/ether 00:07:e9:06:bb:08 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > inet xxx.yyy.z.14/25 brd xxx.yyy.z.127 scope global eth1 > > inet xxx.yyy.z.35/25 brd xxx.yyy.z.127 scope global eth

[Vserver] 36 H0UR V1=AG-RA

2004-03-01 Thread hiram
Did you know That the normal cost for Super V i a g r a is $20, per dose? We are running a hot special!! T0DAY Its only an amazing $3.00 Shipped world wide! DISC0UNT 0RDER: http://healthypolicy.com/sv/index.php?pid=eph9106 mike1 molly1julia quebec kenneth doom2 meow wombat play jo

Re: [Vserver] sometimes vserver do not ping

2004-03-01 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:18:05AM +0100, Gebhardt Thomas wrote: > On Friday 27 February 2004 16:28, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 3: eth1: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 > > > link/ether 00:07:e9:06:bb:08 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > > inet xxx.yyy.z.14/25 brd xxx.yyy.z.127 sc

[Vserver] Vserver with RHEL 3 ES

2004-03-01 Thread Mariano Gonzalvo
Hi, I want to run vserver on my RHEL computer. I know that there's split patches at http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/split-2.4.21-4.0.1.EL-vs1.1.6/ but I supose that it only applies 1.1.6 to RHEL kernel. Does exists some 1.26 patch to RHEL kernel? Excuse my poor

Re: [Vserver] Vserver with RHEL 3 ES

2004-03-01 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 04:12:31PM +0100, Mariano Gonzalvo wrote: > Hi, > >I want to run vserver on my RHEL computer. I know that there's split > patches at > > http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/split-2.4.21-4.0.1.EL-vs1.1.6/ > >but I supose that it only applies 1.1.6 to RHEL ker

[Vserver] sparc: vserver - 2.6.3 - patch-2.6.3-vs0.09 + vs0.09-vs-0.00.1b

2004-03-01 Thread Gerald Leier
hi again, i am using kernel 2.6.3 on debian 3.0 (woody) and try to use vserver-0.23 with it. the system is a sun e450 equipped with 4x 450mhz usparcII cpus. i cant see if there iss ctx in it or not. when issuing vserver-stat i get: how do i check if ctx is working ? is there anyone else using vs

Re: [Vserver] sparc: vserver - 2.6.3 - patch-2.6.3-vs0.09 + vs0.09-vs-0.00.1b

2004-03-01 Thread Bjoern Steinbrink
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 16:30, Gerald Leier wrote: > hi again, > > i am using kernel 2.6.3 on debian 3.0 (woody) and try to use vserver-0.23 > with it. the system is a sun e450 equipped with 4x 450mhz usparcII cpus. > The vserver-0.23 package won't work, for 2.6.x you need util-vserver alpha tools:

Re: [Vserver] Vserver with RHEL 3 ES

2004-03-01 Thread Mariano Gonzalvo
Does exists some 1.26 patch to RHEL kernel? not yet! is there a reason why you do not want to/can not use a vanilla kernel patched with vs1.26? Well, as RHEL includes any patches from RedHat it seems to me like most appropiate. But if there isn't a vserver patch t

Re: [Vserver] Vserver with RHEL 3 ES

2004-03-01 Thread Bogdan B. Rudas
Mariano Gonzalvo wrote: Hi, I want to run vserver on my RHEL computer. I know that there's split patches at http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/split-2.4.21-4.0.1.EL-vs1.1.6/ but I supose that it only applies 1.1.6 to RHEL kernel. Does exists some 1.26 patch to RHEL ke

Re: [Vserver] Network support

2004-03-01 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 09:00:12AM +0100, Thomas Gelf wrote: > Hi all, > > what about offering the vserver user (=administrator) to select between > two possible ways of using networking: > > - first, the traditional way: interface aliases, allowing maximum per- > formance with the limitation tha

[Vserver] SAMBA (smb client) in a veserver (again!)

2004-03-01 Thread Roderick A. Anderson
I've run into the same problem that I have mentioned before with smb mounts causing the system to lock up. I can't prove this yet but it is the only commonality between the different systems having problems. It is an old vserver kernel (2.4.20-ctx17) but attempts to upgrade to a newer kernel

Re: [Vserver] Lean, mean, vserver machine (ah... kernel)

2004-03-01 Thread Roderick A. Anderson
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Sam Vilain wrote: > Turning off the modules you don't use is a minefield, there is no > simple answer. A good rule of thumb is to use `lspci' and `lsmod' and > make sure that for each piece of hardware that identified that you > care about, you have a driver compiled. Thanks

[Vserver] [Release] Development 1.3.8

2004-03-01 Thread Herbert Poetzl
Hi Community! still approaching the point where a final stable release (1.4) for 2.4 (Marcelo Tree) seems doable this release fixes a lot of minor bugs and adds the namespace stuff for testing, not sure if this should be part of 1.4 though ... the changes: * memory enforcement improved

Re: [Vserver] [Release] Development 1.3.8

2004-03-01 Thread Paul Sladen
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > the changes: > * memory enforcement improved > * rlimit interface corrected > * added the bind sequence fix > * zombie with initpid fixed > * sparc support fixed > * iattr commands adapted > * 64bit syscall return fixed and n