Re: [Vserver] /proc must be mounted error

2004-03-19 Thread Enrico Scholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Christian Jung") writes: > Error: /proc must be mounted > ... > The System is a debian. Kernel 2.6.3 + vserver patch-2.6.3-vs0.09.diff Since you are using the experimental kernel patch, you can try the alpha branch of util-vserver: http://www.linux-vserver.org/index.php?

Re: [Vserver] /proc must be mounted error

2004-03-19 Thread Bjoern Steinbrink
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 23:55, Christian Jung wrote: > I did not find anything usefull in the groups. There was something > mentioned > that the proc filesystem is hidden for security reasons and that this > can be > changed with a tool. I did not really understand this, sorry. > As the procfs expo

[Vserver] /proc must be mounted error

2004-03-19 Thread Christian Jung
Hi,   I upgraded my system and now i am in the following situation: All the vservers work fine beside the fact that on every vserver enter the systems tells me:   Error: /proc must be mounted  To mount /proc at boot you need an /etc/fstab line like:  /proc   /proc   proc    defaults  In

Re: [Vserver] vserver and ipv6

2004-03-19 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:45:48PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 07:48:35PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 04:19:03PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > The current vserver patch (1.26) doesn't limit the use > > > of ipv6 address

Re: [Vserver] vserver and ipv6

2004-03-19 Thread Ivo De Decker
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 07:48:35PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 04:19:03PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > > Hello, > > > > The current vserver patch (1.26) doesn't limit the use of ipv6 addresses in > > vservers. The attached patch should disable ipv6 inside vservers, maki

Re: [Vserver] vserver and ipv6

2004-03-19 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 04:19:03PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > Hello, > > The current vserver patch (1.26) doesn't limit the use of ipv6 addresses in > vservers. The attached patch should disable ipv6 inside vservers, making it > possible to enable ipv6 on the main server, without problems cause

Re: AW: [Vserver] AW: several sendmail running, how to deliver mail l ocal?

2004-03-19 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
But isn't 127.0.0.1 mapped to the vserver IP anyway: # vserver grisha enter ipv4root is now 192.168.1.187 New security context is 10187 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:grisha /]telnet 127.0.0.1 25 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to 127.0.0.1. Escape character is '^]'. 220 grisha.ispol.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.10

[Vserver] vserver and ipv6

2004-03-19 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hello, The current vserver patch (1.26) doesn't limit the use of ipv6 addresses in vservers. The attached patch should disable ipv6 inside vservers, making it possible to enable ipv6 on the main server, without problems caused by users inside vservers. Comments? Ideas? Greetings, Ivo De Decker

Re: [Vserver] proc not mounted and other suggestions

2004-03-19 Thread Enrico Scholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herbert Poetzl) writes: > vproc was an experimental tool, and should by now be replaced by > setattr (from util-vserver), enrico, please confirm ... True for alpha branch, false for stable... Enrico ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [Vserver] "Can't chroot Operation not permitted" and other stuff

2004-03-19 Thread Thomas Guettler
Am Donnerstag, 18. März 2004 16:29 schrieb Enrico Scholz: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Guettler) writes: > > If you use "--cap CAP_NET_RAW" with chcontext chroot is not possible. > > I know about miscompilations with SuSE 9 (gcc 3.3.1). Can you try the > '-O0' flag and see if problem still exists?

vproc vs. setattr Was: [Vserver] proc not mounted and other suggestions

2004-03-19 Thread Thomas Guettler
Am Mittwoch, 17. März 2004 11:29 schrieb Herbert Poetzl: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 10:57:27AM +0100, Thomas Guettler wrote: [cut] > vproc /proc/[a-z]* should do nicely (but is not secure) > > > vproc does return 0 if failed. Should be easy to fix. > > vproc was an experimental tool, and should by