Re: [Vserver] unixbench results: vanilla/1.9.1 host/1.9.1 vserver

2004-05-22 Thread Roderick A. Anderson
On Sat, 22 May 2004, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 11:19:26PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Just FYI... > > thanks for checking this for us ... And a thanks from me also. I hope I didn't sound too much like an belligerent ass. > Roderick: I asked Ryan to do those tests

Re: [Vserver] unixbench results: vanilla/1.9.1 host/1.9.1 vserver

2004-05-22 Thread Lucas Albers
Would it make any difference to the benchmark what the native file system on the base system is? It mounts the vserver as a virtual ext3 filesystem. Would it make any difference whether the native file system was ext3 or reiser? -- Luke Computer Science System Administrator Security Administrator

Re: [Vserver] unixbench results: vanilla/1.9.1 host/1.9.1 vserver

2004-05-22 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 01:44:49PM -0600, Lucas Albers wrote: > Would it make any difference to the benchmark what the native file system > on the base system is? > It mounts the vserver as a virtual ext3 filesystem. > Would it make any difference whether the native file system was ext3 or > reiser