[Vserver] problems with 2.6.8-rc2-vs1.9.2.10

2004-07-28 Thread Luc Dumaine
hi, i tried the latest experimental patch, some problems with it. i switched my vservers to the new configuration scheme. i use util-vserver 0.29.214. SMP bi-opteron, kernel compiled x86_64. with 2.6.8-rc2-vs1.9.2.8 i have no problem. but with with 2.6.8-rc2-vs1.9.2.10 starting a vserver doesn't

Re: [Vserver] problems with 2.6.8-rc2-vs1.9.2.10

2004-07-28 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 02:42:46PM +0200, Luc Dumaine wrote: hi, i tried the latest experimental patch, some problems with it. i switched my vservers to the new configuration scheme. i use util-vserver 0.29.214. SMP bi-opteron, kernel compiled x86_64. with 2.6.8-rc2-vs1.9.2.8 i

Re: [Vserver] problems with 2.6.8-rc2-vs1.9.2.10

2004-07-28 Thread Luc Dumaine
On 28.07.2004 15:15, Herbert Poetzl wrote: [..] this sounds like 'badboy', so try adding the following patch to the kernel: http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/namespace-fix-2.6.8-rc2.diff i use the option nonamespace, otherwise it doesn't work. eventually this was not a problem with the

[Vserver] ebuild for alpha util-vserver 0.29.214

2004-07-28 Thread Luc Dumaine
hi, i hacked an ebuild for util-vserver 0.29.214. i can send it by email to the interested parties, or post it on the list if attachments are tolerated. regards. ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Vserver] ebuild for alpha util-vserver 0.29.214

2004-07-28 Thread Georges Toth
hi, could you please make a bugtracker entry on gentoo.org for that ebuild for it to be included in the portage tree ? :-) On Wednesday 28 July 2004 18:44, Luc Dumaine wrote: hi, i hacked an ebuild for util-vserver 0.29.214. i can send it by email to the interested parties, or post it on

[Vserver] RE: [ckrm-tech] CKRM with VServers

2004-07-28 Thread Marc E. Fiuczynski
Pardon for the resend of this crosspost, but I sent it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Marc E. Fiuczynski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 5:29 PM To: Shailabh Nagar; Sam Vilain; ckrm-tech; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL