Quoting Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 05:24:40PM +0200, Sebastian Ganschow wrote:
Hi,
Hi Sebastian!
I've got another Problem. When I'm using Context Disk Limits
it is necassary to set the context ID in the configuration
file with the Option S_CONTEXT. But
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 05:34:49PM -0600, Lucas Albers wrote:
I am trying to create new haresource script to cover vserver.
Does anyone have a haresource script for vserver, they would like to share?
If reading a few lines in italian does not bother you,
here [0] is the
$0 is pretty cheap.
There has never been a better time to upgrade to the newest BlackBerry hardware.
With integrated data voice, you could even ditch that aging cell phone (and keep your phone number!)
Get the powerful BlackBerry email you cant live without, and step up to the nationwide,
To avoid sending a pure test message and being banned from the list,
I'll have to add something useful as well... cowlinks.
Matt and Herbert have told me they really want that project to get
finished asap - reason enough for me to give it some more focus again.
The patches on the webpage got
I am trying to create new haresource script to cover vserver.
Does anyone have a haresource script for vserver, they would like to share?
And could not find more information on doing this.
high availability wiki:
http://linuxha.trick.ca
high availability homepage:
http://www.linux-ha.org/
Thanks, this is exactly what I am looking for.
I will try and translate it to english.
I understand all the configuration files, so it is useful.
Do you have more then one vserver active on the same host server at a time?
Alberto Cammozzo said:
If reading a few lines in italian does not
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 05:05:16PM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
To avoid sending a pure test message and being banned from the list,
I'll have to add something useful as well... cowlinks.
Matt and Herbert have told me they really want that project to get
finished asap - reason enough for me to
On Tue, 3 August 2004 18:06:34 +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
sounds good, btw, I heard the copious locking was
removed? (matt told so, if I got him right)
Yes, that was an interesting idea but turned out to be useless.
addressed in linux-vserver. we are using something
called immutable
