hi :
It keep complaining when I re-run the debootstrap , so i just use --force :)
Cheers
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:43:50 +0200, Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 05:14:27PM +0800, TK Lew wrote:
> > hi :
> >
> > Thank for reply.
> >
> > I am using this command to b
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Sam Vilain wrote:
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
yes, this is if the hard scheduler is actually enabled
That's one I forgot to mention - none of this has any visible effect (and
by that I mean inability to drive the load to 30) u
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
yes, this is if the hard scheduler is actually enabled
That's one I forgot to mention - none of this has any visible effect
(and by that I mean inability to drive the load to 30) unless sched_hard
flag is set.
A load o
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
vsched takes the following arguments:
--fill-rate
The number of tokens that will be placed in the bucket.
--interval
How often (the above specified) number of tokens will be placed.
This is in jiffies. Through some googleing I've found references
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
yes, this is if the hard scheduler is actually enabled
That's one I forgot to mention - none of this has any visible effect (and
by that I mean inability to drive the load to 30) unless sched_hard flag
is set.
So the pacing example should really be:
vc
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 04:11:22PM -0400, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
>
> As promised, here are my vsched findings. My set up is
> util-vserver 0.30.195 and vs 1.9.3.
thanks! I'll try to comment where appropriate ...
> The token-bucket scheduler principle is pretty well explained here:
>
As promised, here are my vsched findings. My set up is
util-vserver 0.30.195 and vs 1.9.3.
The token-bucket scheduler principle is pretty well explained here:
http://www.linux-vserver.org/index.php?page=Linux-VServer-Paper-06
vsched takes the following arguments:
--fill-rate
The number
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Thomas Hug wrote:
Hi
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:20, David MacKinnon wrote:
It's also a bit more cpu intensive than drbd. This may or may not be a
concern for you.
On the 1.9.x vserver this can be addressed with vsched. I've been able to
make it work pretty well and plan on sendin
Thomas Hug wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:20, David MacKinnon wrote:
In my personal experience I've found rsync memory usage starts
escalating with large number of small files. It's also a bit more cpu
intensive than drbd. This may or may not be a concern for you.
It should be possible to rsync so
Hi
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:20, David MacKinnon wrote:
> Mike Fischer wrote:
>
> In my personal experience I've found rsync memory usage starts
> escalating with large number of small files. It's also a bit more cpu
> intensive than drbd. This may or may not be a concern for you.
It should be p
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 05:14:27PM +0800, TK Lew wrote:
> hi :
>
> Thank for reply.
>
> I am using this command to build the vserver :
> ./vserver germanium build --force -m debootstrap -- -d sarge
just curious, any reason to use --force?
> At some stage of the debootstrap it failed on configu
On Thursday 21 October 2004 11:14, TK Lew wrote:
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> exim4-config
> exim4-daemon-light
> at
> exim4
> exim4-base
> mailx
> W: Failure while configuring base packages. This will be attempted 5
> times.
>
> is there anyway i can complete the debootstra
hi :
That do it !
Thanks !
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:53:29 +0200, Kilian Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi TK Lew,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 21.10.2004, 17:14 +0800 schrieb TK Lew:
> > hi :
> >
> > Thank for reply.
> >
> > I am using this command to build the vserver :
> > ./vserver germanium
Hi TK Lew,
Am Donnerstag, den 21.10.2004, 17:14 +0800 schrieb TK Lew:
> hi :
>
> Thank for reply.
>
> I am using this command to build the vserver :
> ./vserver germanium build --force -m debootstrap -- -d sarge
>
> At some stage of the debootstrap it failed on configuring Exim and exits.
>
>
Hello,
> * Herbert Poetzl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 06:01:00PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > Assertion failure in log_do_checkpoint() at fs/jbd/checkpoint.c:361:
> > > "drop_count != 0 || cleanup_ret != 0"
> >
> > you can split up this assertion into
> >
> >
hi :
Thank for reply.
I am using this command to build the vserver :
./vserver germanium build --force -m debootstrap -- -d sarge
At some stage of the debootstrap it failed on configuring Exim and exits.
Errors were encountered while processing:
exim4-config
exim4-daemon-light
at
exim4
ex
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:43:32 +0800
TK Lew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi All :
>
> I have compile a kernel 2.6.8.1 with vserver patch 1.92 and installed
> util-vserver-0.30-1.96.
>
> Installed the vserver using debootstrap using Piere method.
>
> When I start the vserver , I got the following
hi All :
I have compile a kernel 2.6.8.1 with vserver patch 1.92 and installed
util-vserver-0.30-1.96.
Installed the vserver using debootstrap using Piere method.
When I start the vserver , I got the following message :
sauron:/usr/local/util-vserver/etc/init.d# ./vservers-legacy start
Starting
18 matches
Mail list logo
