Re: [Vserver] Casual, naïve implementation of namespace cleanup

2004-11-02 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 07:40:41PM +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote: > Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Currently there are two conflicting requirements: > >> > >> (a) 'vserver ... enter' and operating from the outside in the vserver, and > >> (b) cleaning /proc/mounts > > > > first, I

Re: [Vserver] Plesk 7

2004-11-02 Thread Justin Fielding
I just installed the package from www.atomicrocketturtle.com I then set it up to use their yum repository as well as the fedora legacy repos. Worked well. I blocked kernel, php and apache updates, everything else updated with no problems. Many Thanks, Justin Fielding, Intelliweb Ltd UK. A mis

Re: [Vserver] Plesk 7

2004-11-02 Thread Ehab Heikal
sorry this is a side track how did you update your system via yum, i tried it in virtuozzo and it would not install basic things like GCC with out conflicting with other packages, the rpm package itself inside virtuozo is not the normal version and many things depend a new standard version of rpm.

Re: [Vserver] Casual, naïve implementation of namespace cleanup

2004-11-02 Thread Enrico Scholz
Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Currently there are two conflicting requirements: >> >> (a) 'vserver ... enter' and operating from the outside in the vserver, and >> (b) cleaning /proc/mounts > > first, I would like to split up (a) into > > (a1) 'vserver ... enter' and > (a2) o

Re: [Vserver] Casual, naïve implementation of namespace cleanup

2004-11-02 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 12:52:29PM +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sam Vilain) writes: > > > The following patch, to vservers.functions in the util-vserver > > distribution, will do something of a `namespace cleanup' in lieu of > > the rework to the vserver startup and mount clean

Re: [Vserver] StrongBox Linux

2004-11-02 Thread R. Dale Thomas
Liam Helmer wrote: [snip] Thank you for your reply. Perfectly understandable, there. I will give it a 'look-see'. ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

Re: [Vserver] StrongBox Linux

2004-11-02 Thread Liam Helmer
It will always remain free software. Long Answer: Part of the security of StrongBox linux is in the fact that all the components are digitally signed. To do this, you need to have a CA set up and embedded into the StrongBox initrd. The basic concept money is that I sell pre-built versions that alr

Re: [Vserver] StrongBox Linux

2004-11-02 Thread R. Dale Thomas
Liam Helmer wrote: [snip] Liam, is this 'free software' and will it always remain such? ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

Re: [Vserver] Casual, naïve implementation of namespace cleanup

2004-11-02 Thread Enrico Scholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sam Vilain) writes: > The following patch, to vservers.functions in the util-vserver > distribution, will do something of a `namespace cleanup' in lieu of > the rework to the vserver startup and mount cleanup process that > Enrico has planned (I'm told). Currently there are two

[Vserver] Bugreport: Hang when starting vserver in the background

2004-11-02 Thread Tom Laermans
Hi, A few days ago I started a vserver with "vserver name start&", as I wanted to do other stuff while it was starting. However, it didn't come up... I then typed "fg" to see if it would then come up while in foreground, but it didn't... Terminal just sat there, ctrl-c also did nothing. As I was

Re: [Vserver] Plesk 7

2004-11-02 Thread Justin Fielding
> I have been working on plesk for two years, yes it has some bad points users > love it. Simplifies life. Do you have any idea how your host installed it in > a vserver? They didn't. As I said, my virtual server is via Virtuozzo (or whatever they call it) produced by sw-soft. It's not running v