* Micah Anderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Stephen Frost schrieb am Thursday, den 17. February 2005:
>
> > This is certainly something I'm all for, and were the Debian maintainer
> > of vserver going to upload a kernel-patch for 1.9.4 I'd be happy to help
> > him create that package such that i
Well, I did a fresh install 3 days ago and I'm currently fighting with the
vservers to grant them access to the internet.
Hollow told me 2 weeks ago I had to do this via SNAT. Said, I tried my luck.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING \
-s 192.168.16.0/255.255.255.0 -o eth0 -j SN
Hi bertl,
sounds great to me, go for it! :-)
On Sunday 20 February 2005 02:03, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> Hi Community!
>
> yesterday evening I had the pleasure to meet with
> Serguei Beloussov. we had excellent Dinner at the
> 'Schnitzelwirt' where we talked about - who would
> have guessed - diffe
Herbert,
This is a great honor, congratulations!
Ultimately the decision is up to you, however as someone who has found
your presence in the vserver project to be incredibly valuable, I fear
that we will loose such an important piece of this project if you were
to take this position.
Many free s
Le dimanche 20 Février 2005 01:29, Herbert Poetzl a écrit :
> basically Erwan's contribution/patch is a preliminary
> support for the 'urpmi' tool which can be compared to
> apt or yum (no distro war here please ;) from the util-vserver
> side ... so once this has been evaluated I hope it will be
>
Stephen Frost schrieb am Sunday, den 20. February 2005:
> In general I feel it's:
>
> a) bad form to hijack packages from active maintainers
I'm not suggesting to hijack these packages.
> b) Have multiple source packages in the archive for the same programs
The difference between these progra
Le dimanche 20 Février 2005 19:31, Micah Anderson a écrit :
> Herbert,
> This is a great honor, congratulations!
[...]
> I do not say all of this to dissuade you from taking this job, if you
> need to take it, you should, the decision is up to you. I for one
> would miss greatly Bertl if he was not
Velu Erwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Velu Erwan a écrit :
>
>> Here come the patch I've made to be able to use the urpmi (an apt
>> like tool) and the mandrakelinux distribution.
>> This is the first version, I still have some work todo to add
>> options to urpmi but this version has been test
Hello
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 04:11:57AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Micah Anderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Stephen Frost schrieb am Thursday, den 17. February 2005:
> >
> > > This is certainly something I'm all for, and were the Debian maintainer
> > > of vserver going to upload a ker
On the other hand... always remember to look out for #1.
Taking over a Free Software Project isn't a life sentence. You've
already put in a monumental contribution to vserver, don't let a whole
load of whining users give you the impression that to follow what is good
for you is somehow not thought
Enrico Scholz a écrit :
First thing, thanks to handle my patch so quickly.
I would prefer a shorter 'mandrake' here ;)
Everyone prefer mandrake but the real name is Mandrakelinux.
I do not know if urpmi supports this, but it should be possible to
specify the version of Mandrake Linux. E.g.
| vse
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
yesterday evening I had the pleasure to meet with
Serguei Beloussov. we had excellent Dinner at the
'Schnitzelwirt'
Which one? There are so many "Schnitzelwirt" in and around Vienna.
he clearly pointed out that his company has some
interest, that virtualization techniques -
Stephen Frost wrote:
In general I feel it's:
a) bad form to hijack packages from active maintainers
b) Have multiple source packages in the archive for the same programs
c) effectively go around the existing maintainer
ACK - mostly.
First I have to disclaim, that I am new to this list, and have no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Velu Erwan) writes:
>>I do not know if urpmi supports this, but it should be possible to
>>specify the version of Mandrake Linux. E.g.
>>
>>| vserver ... build -m urpmi -- -d mdk10
>>
>>
>>
> Of course it could be done, but the main idea was to install the
> vserver using the vi
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Nicolas Costes wrote:
You need to deeply discuss those facts with the company, and why not try to
secure the vservers' future in the job contract... My english is too bad when
it comes to that domain, but I can try to say it like this: "I agree to work
for you if you agree to s
Hi Helmut,
> Solutions can be:
> - the Debian maintainer finds a way to keep in track
he is.
> - some advanced users provide patches or .debs outside of Debian
there are packages that WorkForMe(TM) and i have long standing offered
to hand them to everybody interested on this list. Moreover Ola
Hello!
I want give my virtual server private ip-address : 10.0.0.32
System - Debian Woody
And this is rules from NAT table:
## this is working
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -p tcp -o eth0 -s 10.0.0.0/26 -j SNAT
--to-source $real_ip
## but this is not working
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p
17 matches
Mail list logo
