Le vendredi 1 Avril 2005 22:23, Herbert Poetzl a écrit :
the v_* wrappers on the host are there to restrict
the services '*' to some IPs, so that similar services
inside the guests could bind to their IPs ...
(otherwise they would fail, because the host's service
is already bound to that port
Maybe this has nothing to do with vservers, but maybe it has, so...
I installed Samba and Cups in a vserver. File sharing work well (Did not
take too much tweaking regarding interface binding ;)), Cups too.
But when I want to upload the Windows drivers to Samba, from a Windows
machine, they
Hi Everyone,
I apologise if this has been asked recently, but I'm just wondering is
there some kind of time frame for a stable VServer 2.6 release?
Regards,
Jonathan
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
Hi Everyone,
I apologise if this has been asked recently, but I'm just wondering is
there some kind of time frame for a stable VServer 2.6 release?
Regards,
Jonathan
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 07:35:40AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hello
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 05:16:28PM +0100, Gaz Wilson wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with the development branch of Vserver
and Debian?
Yes I'm the maintainer and yesterday util-vserver 0.30.204 finally
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 04:58:31PM +1000, Jonathan Thorpe wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I apologise if this has been asked recently, but I'm just wondering is
there some kind of time frame for a stable VServer 2.6 release?
well, yes, the timeframe is roughly 2-3 months of time
I can spend on
Hello
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 05:33:37PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 07:35:40AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hello
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 05:16:28PM +0100, Gaz Wilson wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with the development branch of Vserver
and
dietlibc version 0.28 built fine on x86_64, but it simply didn't work
(caused all kinds of problems with vserver).
Paul
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hello
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 05:33:37PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 07:35:40AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hello
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:44:07PM -0400, Paul S. Gumerman wrote:
dietlibc version 0.28 built fine on x86_64, but it simply didn't work
(caused all kinds of problems with vserver).
I did not really understand this. I understand that dietlibc compile
on x86_64 but:
* dietlibc, do it
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hello
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:44:07PM -0400, Paul S. Gumerman wrote:
dietlibc version 0.28 built fine on x86_64, but it simply didn't work
(caused all kinds of problems with vserver).
I did not really understand this. I understand that
* Ola Lundqvist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
* util-vserver, do it work?
no
Thanks a lot for the information. It is good to know so I can take
actions so it will not be included (in that arch) if Debian ship with
x86_64 as a release arch.
x86_64 isn't a release arch for Debian/sarge
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:44:46PM +0200, Balint Laszlo BILLER wrote:
Hi,
I tried to build SuSE and Fedora vservers on a Debian system (sarge). I
didn't found apt-rpm or yum for debian so I think it sould be done with
rpm. Am I right? Or is there apt-rpm or yum available for debian? I'd
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:05:47PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hello
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:44:07PM -0400, Paul S. Gumerman wrote:
dietlibc version 0.28 built fine on x86_64, but it simply didn't work
(caused all kinds of problems with vserver).
I did not really understand this. I
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:39:25PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Ola Lundqvist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
* util-vserver, do it work?
no
Thanks a lot for the information. It is good to know so I can take
actions so it will not be included (in that arch) if Debian ship with
x86_64
Has anyone tried the CentOs 4.0 distribution with linux-vserver? It's a
repackage of RedHat Enterprise Linux 4.0. I'm currently using A
mish-mash of FC1, 2 3 and I'm considering a switch to CentOs. Two of
my servers are Opteron-based, so I'm particularly interested if you are
using the
* Herbert Poetzl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:39:25PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Ola Lundqvist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
* util-vserver, do it work?
no
Thanks a lot for the information. It is good to know so I can take
actions so it will not be
Hi all,
I'm trying to set up vserver on my SuSE Linux 9.2 box running 2.6.11.5
kernel with vserver 1.9.5 patch and util-vserver-0.30.204.
I met a number of issues, perhaps because this is the first time I play
with vservers.
1) vprocunhide (i.e. setattr) spits out a lot of Bad address messages.
On 2005.04.05 12:41:12 +1200, Michal Ludvig wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to set up vserver on my SuSE Linux 9.2 box running 2.6.11.5
kernel with vserver 1.9.5 patch and util-vserver-0.30.204.
I met a number of issues, perhaps because this is the first time I play
with vservers.
1)
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 12:41:12PM +1200, Michal Ludvig wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to set up vserver on my SuSE Linux 9.2 box running 2.6.11.5
kernel with vserver 1.9.5 patch and util-vserver-0.30.204.
I met a number of issues, perhaps because this is the first time I play
with vservers.
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 12:41:12PM +1200, Michal Ludvig wrote:
puck:root:~# /usr/local/sbin/setattr /proc/uptime
/proc/uptime: Bad address
that is at least unusual ... you sure the kernel was
compiled with the vserver patch?
Yes, it is. But the binary is somehow
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 01:32:59PM +1200, Michal Ludvig wrote:
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 12:41:12PM +1200, Michal Ludvig wrote:
puck:root:~# /usr/local/sbin/setattr /proc/uptime
/proc/uptime: Bad address
that is at least unusual ... you sure the kernel was
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 01:32:59PM +1200, Michal Ludvig wrote:
I'm now recompiling without optimalizations and with debug symbols.
BTW it was linked with dietlibc-0.28
if possible, try with a non 3.4.x compiler too (if that
fails for whatever reason)
Works fine
Hello
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:39:25PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Ola Lundqvist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
* util-vserver, do it work?
no
Thanks a lot for the information. It is good to know so I can take
actions so it will not be included (in that arch) if Debian ship
23 matches
Mail list logo
