Hello
I found the solution myself. I had obviously added that option
myself as it was previously needed to build on sparc. Now it
has been removed so I assume it is ok.
Sorry for bothering you.
Regards,
// Ola
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 09:00:42AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> forwarded 321171 vs
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 09:33:48AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hello
>
> I found the solution myself. I had obviously added that option
> myself as it was previously needed to build on sparc. Now it
> has been removed so I assume it is ok.
>
> Sorry for bothering you.
np, hope you updated the
Michal,
That's great to hear! Xen and Vserver are IMHO highly complimentary and it'd
be great to be able to use them together. The VServer patch (last time I
checked) was very nicely arch independent but I think it's quite a long time
since anybody has tried to run it on Xen - well done!
It'
FYI, I have submitted the following bug reports/feature requests to
Savannah on util-vserver:
#14034 Vserver shutdown does not remove IP address
#14033 vdlimit --all or vdlimit-stat (Feature Request)
#14032 vsomething does not work properly
#14026 vdlimit performs vc_add_limit()
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 04:01:29PM +0100, Mark Williamson wrote:
> Michal,
>
> That's great to hear! Xen and Vserver are IMHO highly complimentary
> and it'd be great to be able to use them together. The VServer patch
> (last time I checked) was very nicely arch independent but I think
> it's quit
> yes, xen is just _another_ arch and once it will be in
> mainline (IIRC they are working on it), we will of course
> support it out of the box (as we do for UML now)
Yep, they're working on it now. It's in the Real Soon Now category, just
needs some restructuring. Of possible interest to you
Hello,
is it possible to implement the possibility for the vserver patch to
reroute or fake command like umount, mount, etc.. ??
This way, it will no longer be necessary to modify startup script,
shutdown script, etc..
regards,
--
Jean-Christophe Petit
Directeur R&D et DSI
Syspark inc.
T: 1
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 03:17:38PM -0400, Jean-Christophe Petit wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is it possible to implement the possibility for the vserver patch to
> reroute or fake command like umount, mount, etc.. ??
yes, that would be possible, but it would probably be
easier to 'just' replace the comm
Have vs2.0 been released yet then?
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>Greetings Community!
>
>this is supposed to be the last release candidate
>for the upcoming stable release 2.0 ...
>
>again, please give it a try and report back any issues
>you encounter ... we are planning to release it as
>final vs2.0 w
