> >
> > Do you mean CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_XATTR in the kernel config?
>
> well, this might also be responsible, but, for
> unknwon reasons, you need to _also_ specfiy the
> 'attrs' mount option if you want to use attributes
> on resier filesystems ...
>
"attrs" seems to be enough:
# showattr /var
> > Linux dusk 2.6.14-vs2.1.0-rc5+g3 #1 SMP Sat Nov 5 18:01:33 CET 2005 i386
> > GNU/Linux
>
> hmm, I'd assume this comes from /etc/issue .. while
>From "/etc/motd", which probably by coincidence contained the right (well,
wrong, in the case of the host) architecture specification. It must hav
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 11:08:38PM +0100, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> > > > > lsattr: Inappropriate ioctl for device While reading flags on
> > > > > /var/lib/vservers/
> > > >
> > > > no idea, but sounds like your filesystem @ /var/lib/vservers
> > > > doesn't support the barrier ...
> > > >
> > >
>
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 11:50:39PM +0100, Gilles wrote:
> Hello.
>
> >
> > just for the record, on IRC we found out that:
> >
> > - a guest script was setting the host name to dusk
> >
>
> I deactivated that script, so now it works but... It
> seems as if the guest takes a little time to mak
I have many ip addresses on each of 4 ethernet cards using iproute2.
one of my guests must absolutely always send and receive on a certain ip
address which is not the first ip on the card. I have bound the service
(radius) to that ip which is the only one the guest is given. I have not
proven
Hello.
>
> just for the record, on IRC we found out that:
>
> - a guest script was setting the host name to dusk
>
I deactivated that script, so now it works but... It
seems as if the guest takes a little time to make up
its mind about what its name is ;-)
dusk:~$ ssh i386
Password:
Linux d
Hi.
> > > > lsattr: Inappropriate ioctl for device While reading flags on
> > > > /var/lib/vservers/
> > >
> > > no idea, but sounds like your filesystem @ /var/lib/vservers
> > > doesn't support the barrier ...
> > >
> >
> > It's an LVM volume with reiserfs.
>
> this means you forgot to specify
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 13:58 +0100, Grzegorz Nosek wrote:
> The test cases I've found are:
> - no QoS at all
> everything runs smoothly
> - root qdisc on eth0 set to htb (or pfifo, or sfq)
> still everything nice and smooth
> - default class on eth0 set to htb (rate 1Gbit, so it's not true
> bandwit
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 05:27:56PM +0100, Marcel Gsteiger wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I installed the kernel patches and utils successfully on my dual
> xeon-ia32 fc4-x86_64 box now running
xeon-ia32 with x86_64 ? well, folks @ intel must
be drinking ...
> 2.6.13-1.1532_FC4.vs2.0.1.0.pre2.1smp (after r
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 01:58:09PM +0100, Grzegorz Nosek wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm experiencing a weird problem with htb and vservers. First, a bit
> about my setup: the machine is a dual-core AMD64 (2.6.13.4, vserver
> 2.1.0-rc4) running 8 guests (where all but 3 are mostly idle). The 3
> active gue
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 04:00:13PM +0100, Gilles wrote:
> >
> > hmm, could you try with the mainline 0.30.209 please?
> >
>
> # vserver --version
> vserver 0.30.209 -- manages the state of vservers
> This program is part of util-vserver 0.30.209
>
> Still:
>
> $ ssh i386
> Password:
> Linux dus
On Monday 07 November 2005 10:21 am, Oliver Welter wrote:
yes when I installed 1.2 on a guest I had to edit the configure file to change
all 127.0.0.1 to something like 127.0.0.3 which then passed the tests.
as a 'just in case' measure I also changed my hosts file to reflect this ip
for localho
Hi all
I installed the kernel patches and utils successfully on my dual
xeon-ia32 fc4-x86_64 box now running
2.6.13-1.1532_FC4.vs2.0.1.0.pre2.1smp (after recompiling the SRPMS for
this arch). I use util-vserver 0.30.209-5.
Then, I adapted /etc/vservers/.distributions/fc4/apt/sources.list to
point
> Given news like http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/65815
> I'd be interested in an informal comparison of Solaris zones
> and VServer.
>
We actually discussed this several months ago at length. Check the archives
for the history of that conversation.
In a nutshell, here is my *opinion* [1]
Hi,
I think that this problem is related to the nonexisting 127.0.0.1
address. If I remeber correctly than nagios try to ping this address and
cant reach it
I think that I simply commented this check out in the scripts
Oliver
Evert Meulie wrote:
(cross-post from: http://www.meulie.net/
>
> hmm, could you try with the mainline 0.30.209 please?
>
# vserver --version
vserver 0.30.209 -- manages the state of vservers
This program is part of util-vserver 0.30.209
Still:
$ ssh i386
Password:
Linux dusk 2.6.14-vs2.1.0-rc5+g3 #1 SMP Sat Nov 5 18:01:33 CET 2005 x86_64
GNU/Linux
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 03:26:41PM +0100, Evert Meulie wrote:
> (cross-post from: http://www.meulie.net/forum_viewtopic.php?94.4177 )
> I'm attempting to install Nagios 2.x on a vserver. However, the build stops
> with:
>
> checking for ICMP ping syntax...
>
>
> Has anyone else come acro
(cross-post from: http://www.meulie.net/forum_viewtopic.php?94.4177 )
Hi all!
I'm attempting to install Nagios 2.x on a vserver. However, the build stops
with:
checking for ICMP ping syntax...
Has anyone else come across this problem before?
Regards,
Evert
__
Hello
I'm experiencing a weird problem with htb and vservers. First, a bit
about my setup: the machine is a dual-core AMD64 (2.6.13.4, vserver
2.1.0-rc4) running 8 guests (where all but 3 are mostly idle). The 3
active guests are:
- d829 (a mysql server)
- v830
- v831 (two apache vservers)
The te
Given news like http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/65815
I'd be interested in an informal comparison of Solaris zones
and VServer.
I have not yet personally used either, but I'd be interested
in a comparison.
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl
_
20 matches
Mail list logo
