1. include/linux/sys.h: vanilla 2.4.21 had
#define NR_syscalls 270
but RHEL 2.4.21 has
#define NR_syscalls 271
So should I make NR_syscalls now 274 or 275?
2. include/linux/sched.h: any ideas what to do with this hunk (following)?
There's nothing even vaguely like it that I can see.
Hi Jacques,
Just a note: I had to install the compat-gcc-c++ RPM and associated
dependencies in order to get the 0.28 tools to install on RH9. This wasn't
needed with 0.25 or 0.26.
Any reason why this is needed?
# rpm -Uvh vserver-0.28-1.i386.rpm
warning: vserver-0.28-1.i386.rpm: V3 DSA
Hi Tyrone,
Unfortunately the documentation is still under development so you'll have to
do a bit of work to understand how things function. That said, there is some
documentation already, could you start from there and let us know what you
need explained more? Then perhaps we can fill in the
appreciate your help in getting me this far.
Thanks
TyroneM
From: Charles Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2003/11/23 Sun AM 09:04:27 EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Vserver] Rpms for vserver 0.27 (got it)
[Sorry accidentally sent this half way through
Hi Jean!
Mm I think you're a little confused. The vserver package that you've
downloaded doesn't have anything to do with the kernel - that's the
userspace tools. And you don't need to compile them for yourself, because
you can download a binary RPM here:
Hi Edy,
1. Grab either the v1.0 (stable) or v1.1.5 (development, release candidate)
releases from http://linux-vserver.org/. Further kernel patch development is
happening on linux-vserver.org, superseding the downloads on
www.solucorp.qc.ca
2. If you use the development (1.1.5) release you will
Hi Everyone,
The recent Christmas joviality spurred me into some doc writing. I started a
bit of reorganisation at good ol' linux-vserver.org.
I've created a Step-by-Step Guide. It's rather malnourished at the moment
(no it's not as simple as it might seem!), but remember that, unlike at the
Well Dovecot is quite nice (dovecot.something.fi, hmm you better ask Googs). BUT
don't try it with mbox mailboxes. I got some pretty bad borkage. I also
couldn't understand how the chrooting worked - it failed for some of my users
but I couldn't work out why.
It's probably great if you run it
Mm, bugger. I had tried
# rpm -q --redhatrequires libdb.so.4
# rpm -q --redhatrequires db4
but not
# rpm -q --redhatrequires libdb-4.0.so
The latter gives the following list:
cyrus-sasl-2.1.10-4
db4-utils-4.0.14-20
gnucash-1.8.1-3
httpd-2.0.40-21
inn-2.3.4-2
libtabe-0.2.6-3
make things much clearer... Maybe Jack can tell us which rpm
he's using.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Herbert Poetzl
Sent: Friday, 7 November 2003 3:05 AM
To: Charles Dale
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Vserver
On Thursday, November 06, 2003 10:28 AM NZT,
Jan-Hendrik Heuing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks a bit like there is no straight way using redhat9 with
vserver, am I right with this conclusion ?
Correct... that's assuming redhat9 uses NPTL, I'm pretty sure
it does but somebody
11 matches
Mail list logo
