On Wednesday 13 October 2004 06:35, David MacKinnon wrote:
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
I had something similar happen, but then it turned out the problem was
with my config. I figured it out by inserting an occasional echo
statement into
Hi,
here is the strace of the last action of a vserver stop
- reboot - :-)
...
...
Rebooting...
execve(/sbin/reboot, [reboot, -d, -f, -i], [/* 23 vars */]) = 0
uname({sys=Linux, node=distcc, ...}) = 0
brk(0) = 0x804b000
old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
On Wednesday 13 October 2004 15:32, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:39:53 +1000
David MacKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just ran into this today one some new servers I'm setting up.
util-vserver 0.30.195 (but it happened with 190 as well)
vserver 2.6 patch 1.9.2 on
On Wednesday 13 October 2004 16:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi evreybody,
I 'm trying to work with Vserver 2.6 branch, patch version 1.9.3-rc2 on
a debian kernel 2.6.8-1-686, and an util-vserver package 0.30.195.
After a good compil, a build creation with legacy mode, all seem to work
Hi,
caspeng strikes again...
$ cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.4.27-piv-smp-vs1.29-rc2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.4
(Debian 1:3.3.4-6sarge1)) #1 SMP Tue Sep 21 13:33:16 CEST 2004
$ lsmod
Module Size Used byNot tainted
nfs74040 1
On Tuesday 12 October 2004 13:45, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 01:22:11PM +0200, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
Hi,
caspeng strikes again...
$ cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.4.27-piv-smp-vs1.29-rc2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.4
(Debian 1:3.3.4-6sarge1
On Friday 01 October 2004 13:23, Bjoern Steinbrink wrote:
Hi Christian
On Fr, 2004-10-01 at 12:18, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently in trying out the experimental vs1.92 and
the new utils on debian.
A lot of issues have been fixed since 1.9.2, currently there a 1.9.3
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 23:36, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
A short question: Is it identical to -rc2?
yep, sorry forgot to mention that!
best,
Herbert
Thanks, that saves some work :-)
--
lg, Chris
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 20 September 2004 17:19, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
On Monday 20 September 2004 16:54, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 04:29:37PM +0200, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
Hi,
I've got an oops with kernel 2.4.26 and vserver 1.27.
ksymoops 2.4.5 on i686 2.4.26
On Tuesday 21 September 2004 12:07, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 11:58:41AM +0200, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
On Monday 20 September 2004 17:19, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
On Monday 20 September 2004 16:54, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 04:29:37PM +0200
On Monday 20 September 2004 16:54, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 04:29:37PM +0200, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
Hi,
I've got an oops with kernel 2.4.26 and vserver 1.27.
ksymoops 2.4.5 on i686 2.4.26-686-smp-vs1.27-hot1. Options used
-v vmlinux (specified
Hi,
is the 1.29-RC2 patch stable?
I'm asking because I did not find any bug reports for that version.
My Athlon test system is now up for one month without any issue, anybody else?
--
lg, Chris
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is this?
I guess it's incompatible with linux vserver:
http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3823?PHPSESSID=547dfb4ca1fb6e90bc185bba02229ea5
--
lg, Chris
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
On Wednesday 08 September 2004 23:04, Tor Rune Skoglund wrote:
- classification (when is a patch stable) really depends
on the feedback from the community, no feedback might
be mistaken as good stability ...
- stable branch and release candidates will only get bugfixes,
no feature
On Friday 27 August 2004 18:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have it compiled and waiting. I will be rebooting 3 high-load
production machines from 2.4.23-vs1.22 and 2.4.25-vs1.26 into
2.4.27-vs1.29-rc2. I will be sure to let you know of my results.
-Josh
Great to know that rc2 has got some
Hi,
I haven't heard anything on the stability of vs1.29-rc2.
I will let you know that vs1.29-rc2 is doing well with the following setup:
Linux version 2.4.27-686-smp-vs1.29-rc2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.4
(Debian 1:3.3.4-3)) #1 SMP Wed Aug 11 20:28:34 CEST 2004
processor : 0
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 14:37, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hello
I have got a request to include vproc into util-vserver.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=258038
Where can I find that tool, and do you think it will work with
the stable release of util-vserver?
Regards,
//
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 15:59, jfl wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to start a dhcpd in a vserver :
Starting dhcpd: Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Server V3.0.1
Copyright 2004 Internet Systems Consortium.
All rights reserved.
For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/
unable to
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 16:25, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
Have a look at /usr/include/linux/capability.h
In your case you will have to add the line
S_CAPS=CAP_NET_RAW
to /etc/MYVSERVER.conf
Note: Every additionally granted capability weakens the security of your
vserver.
Sorry
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 18:19, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
oops, spoken too fast ... a few minutes after that
we managed to spot a permission issue which should
now be fixed in rc2 ...
Thanks, maybe advertise it as stable release candiate on the vserver homepage
and keep it out for one or two
On Monday 26 July 2004 15:41, Veit Wahlich wrote:
Am Mo, den 26.07.2004 schrieb Ehab Heikal um 14:25:
How do I compile latest 1.28 for SMP ( dual xeons I am dreaming to get )
You should not expect any problems. Simply enable SMP. Set the max.
number of CPUs to 4 to enable both SMP and
On Tuesday 20 April 2004 16:01, David Amiel wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm new to the vserver world, and I have a suestion for you :)
I find very interesting the idea behind vserver but as I'm working in
production world I need to be sure that services are always online.
So to lower the service
On Tuesday 20 April 2004 16:26, David Amiel wrote:
Thank you for your,
drdb could be the beginning of the solution, I'll have a look.
Now I need VRRP between the servers, and/or a mechanism to move on services
between the 2 vservers (via mon ?).
Does Ip implementation of vservers support
Matt Ayres wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing to find out what kind of loads people are running VServer
under currently.
This is the information that be appreciated:
* VServer kernel + tools version
2.4.25-vs1.26 + reiserfs data logging
Jaques 0.29 tools, as debian package, woody system
* Average number of
Viorel Anghel wrote:
My first post here and i would like to thank to all the developers for
their terrific work.
Now, my problem. Short story: kernel 2.4.24, vserver 1.26 (no other
patches). bind9 with nocapset (Paul Sladen's debian packages), running
inside a vserver. doesn't answer to udp
Floris van Gog wrote:
BIND9 does not even need CAP_SYS_RESOURCE. It is running in a vserver
here (1.2x) without problems with S_CAP= in the config file.
Why grant it things it does not need?
Standard bind9 on debian does not even start without CAP_SYS_RESOURCE.
That's why there are packages from
Jan Panoch wrote:
Hi All,
Have anyone a idea, how to avoid this security risk and continue to use
XFS as my filesystem?
1.26 patch is functional only on ext2/ext3 filesystems, i think..
What about reiserfs?
chattr is a tool from e2fsprogs.
Are non unified vservers fine?
chattr +t /vservers
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
1) should the 2.4 branch be frozen, and if when?
I'm happy with the features of 1.23 for now ;-)
2) is it bad if 2.4 and 2.6 branches diverge?
Not for me.
3) is multitude (2.4/2.6/2.6SE) preferred over
development speed?
I'd suggest security + bugfixes for 2.4
VServer wrote:
Hello again:
This email is in reference to a problem I reported back in December 18, 2003.
Well, due to shortage of time as my real job kept me very busy, I never got
an opportunity to try vs1.21 on my kernel 2.4.23 as suggested by Herbert.
Just yesterday I decided to upgrade
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:15:02AM +0100, Bert De Vuyst wrote:
I think this problem is not related to the kernel, but to the vserver tools.
Running vserver tools 0.29 + patch-vserver-0.29-fix01.diff on a machine
running kernel 2.4.23-vs1.22, did give the same problem.
,
Christian Mayrhuber
Osiris Softwareentwicklung KEG
Wienerstr. 131
4020 Linz
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
Thats exactly the problem I have.
The dns setup is right. It happens from the root server (ctx 0), too.
But does not happen if I use a standard kernel with the same configuration.
The remote mailserver is behind a netfilter firewall.
Some additional information
Lus Miguel Silva wrote:
It looks to me like some problem with the hardware! :o)
Best,
+---
| Lus Miguel Silva
| Network Administrator@ ISPGaya.pt
| Rua Antnio Rodrigues da Rocha, 291/341
| Sto. Ovdio 4400-025 V. N. de Gaia
| Portugal
| T: +351 22
christian niessner wrote:
das ist aber nicht zufaellig das tcp_ecn problem?
cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
echo 0 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
weil, imho, bis 2.4.18 war default 0, ab 2.4.19 ist default 1...
ciao,
marvin
Ja ist es! (Yes it is!)
Vielen Dank!
Here is what
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
Hi Community!
for those who read about the newly discovered
exploits in 2.4.23 ... and those who haven't
yet, I decided to update the latest vserver
patches (including the first stable release)
to 2.4.24 ...
you can find them together with updated, signed
md5sums on
Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
The IPV4 bug is in vserver 1.00, but fixed in vserver 1.22, right?
I'll answer this myself.
Both questions YES.
Following patch should fix it for vserver 1.00:
http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/patch-vs1.00-fix.diff
I'll use that for my servers.
Seems to be the only
Works as advertised.
Tested with kernel-2.6.0-test9 and e2fsprogs headers.
--
lg, Chris
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Enrico Scholz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Mayrhuber) writes:
ln -sf '/lib/modules/2.4.22-c17h-xfs/build/include/linux/virtual.h'
'linuxvirtual.h' test -e 'linuxvirtual.h' || \
ln -sf './lib/virtual.h' 'linuxvirtual.h'
...
In file included from lib/syscall_rlimit.c:29:
lib
38 matches
Mail list logo
