Hi,
since 2.6.22-1-vs2.2.0.3-rc1, clone(..., CLONE_NEWNS) fails with
-EPERM. Previous kernels allowed this when the VXC_SECURE_MOUNT
ccap was set:
With 2.6.21.5-vs2.2.0-rc3:
| # vcontext --create -- vattribute --secure --ccap VXC_SECURE_MOUNT -- \
| vcontext --migrate-self --endsetup -- vnames
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Corey Wright) writes:
> "clean-up hash directory"
> http://www.paul.sladen.org/vserver/archives/200609/0016.html
Can be written much shorter as
| find /vservers/.hash/ -links 1 | xargs rm -f
| find /vservers/.hash/ -type d | xargs rmdir 2>/dev/null
(no need for '-0' flag)
Hi,
it would be nice when the current
| + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
| + mnt_flags |= MNT_NODEV;
behavior can be relaxed a little bit. I need it e.g. to bind-mount a
/dev filesystem into buildroots which will be created during runtime of
the vserver.
On first glance,
| +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herbert Poetzl) writes:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/work/test# strace -fF -o vcmd.trace ./vcmd
>> syscall: unknown syscall trap 0xef000139
this might be/is an EABI issue
>> "unknow syscall" should be a strace bug, I think. The
>> basic failure is becuase of "illegal instruction" du
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herve Guillemet) writes:
> There was some mail exchanges some month ago on the list between
> Enrico and Alberto about vhashify SIGSEGV on Debian x86_64. How did
> this end ? I seem to have the same problem:
Does 'make check' report errors for the hashcalc* tests? If so, somebo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Benedikt Böhm) writes:
> With regard to the /dev/pts issue on "vserver enter" i have ported
> the vlogin application from vserver-utils to util-vserver-0.30.210
Mmmh... without looking at the complete code, doing operations in the
shown order is insecure:
> + if (vc_ctx_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Ipsen) writes:
> I've created my own repo with Whitebox Enterprise Linux 4 - but when trying
> to add a vserver (for which a logical volume has been created and mounted in
> /vservers/vsrv01-mysql) I get this error:
> ...
> | error: unpacking of archive failed on file /u
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Oliver Welter) writes:
> eergh - it seems that vunify does not support gentoo guest. Anyone
> here can help me out ?
Implementing the 'get-conffiles' operation for the 'gentoo' case in
'scripts/vpkg' should help. I do not know gentoo enough to develop it
myself.
Enrico
pgp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wilhelm Meier) writes:
> I'm using Gentoo as a host and also Gentoo as VPSs. If I try to
> vunify/vhashify two VPS, I get:
>
> gs vservers # ln
> -s /etc/vservers/vs01 /etc/vservers/vs01c/apps/vunify/refserver.00
>
> gs vservers # vserver vs01c unify
> Can not determine packag
Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> it would be nice when /proc/version could be virtualized (e.g. using
>> values from VCMD_set_vhi_name). Currently, it reveals information about
>> the real host (e.g. real os version, buildhost/-user).
>
> hmm, looking at the code, I see:
>
> static in
Hello,
it would be nice when /proc/version could be virtualized (e.g. using
values from VCMD_set_vhi_name). Currently, it reveals information about
the real host (e.g. real os version, buildhost/-user).
Hiding /proc/version is not possible because some programs (e.g. 'pidof')
use it to check whet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Francis Lee) writes:
> I have succeeded in building an FC4 vserver host with several guest
> servers.
>
> I would like to "unify" them, share as many files among them as possible
> via hardlinks.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /lib/util-vserver/vunify -nv dhcp-dns
> Failed to in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Braeuer) writes:
> I'm not sure where to mount an LVM2 device with vs2.0. I do
> not want to mount it on system boot, but when starting the
> guest vserver.
>
> The fstab file in the vserver config directory seems to be the right place.
>
> But when including an entry like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roché Compaan) writes:
> Squid takes longer than most processes to stop, and this seems be a
> problem when stopping a vserver:
> ...
> Stopping proxy server: (waiting.../usr/sbin/vserver: line
> 85: 20939 Killed "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ${USE_VNAMESPACE:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Francis Lee) writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# vserver dns build -m yum
> ...
> Execution will continue in 5 seconds...
> ...
> The process hangs after the 5 seconds message
Does it really hang or does it download the repository metadata?
Can be e.g. checked with 'netstat' o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bodo Eggert) writes:
> If I run 'make install', the make script tries to compile a
> file.
Can not reproduce that
> Off cause this can't work out, since I transfered the pre-built
> directory from the machine with my compiler to my server, where
> I want to install.
What is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Enrico Scholz) writes:
> two check of util-vserver 0.30.209 are failing on a PPC machine...
>
> | /bin/sh: line 1: 18778 Killed ensc_use...
ok, seems to be caused by a bug in the kernel elf loader
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cg
Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> my VPN VServer do not work anymore with 2.6.14-vs2.0.1-pre3-prelim
>> kernels. There, I get
>>
>> | unregister_netdevice: waiting for tun50 to become free. Usage count = 1
> ...
> could you check if this patch fixes the issue for you?
>
> http://vserv
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (alberto) writes:
> I finally had time to test vhasify on an i386 with valgrind, attached
> is the output. Same debian source package as I used for x86_64 and
> same options (added beecrypt2{,-dev} to dependencies so pbuilder
> builds it with vhashify).
Using 'valgrind' on the '
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jens Holze) writes:
> I just realised that there is this copy program among the utils but it
> doesn't work (obviously because of the changes since the alpha, looks
> for .conf file). While copying the servers is not hard to do manually,
> is somebody actually working on this to
Hello,
my VPN VServer do not work anymore with 2.6.14-vs2.0.1-pre3-prelim
kernels. There, I get
| unregister_netdevice: waiting for tun50 to become free. Usage count = 1
like errors and every netdevice related operation (e.g. 'ip route show')
stucks in 'D' state.
Exactly the same setup works wi
Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> two check of util-vserver 0.30.209 are failing on a PPC machine.
>> ...
>> http://ensc.de/vserver/cflags
>> http://ensc.de/vserver/personality
>
> $ ./cflags
> Killed
>
> $ ./personality
> Killed
>
> here are my versions:
>
> http://vserver.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Peter McGregor") writes:
> No Match for argument: indexhtml-4-1.centos4
> No Match for argument: redhat-logos-1.1.25-1.centos4.3
> No Match for argument: setup-2.5.37-1.1
> No Match for argument: tzdata-2004e-2
> No Match for argument: glibc-2.3.4-2
>
> Yum can find some files,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Peter McGregor") writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum --version
> 2.4.0
Try to apply
http://savannah.nongnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/util-vserver/util-vserver/scripts/vyum-worker.diff?r1=1.5&r2=1.6
(not in 0.209). yum-2.4 problems were easier to solve than I thought... ;)
E
Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> as you can see in
>>
>>
>> http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/349-util-vserver-0.30.209-2.fc5/ppc/build.log
>>
>> two check of util-vserver 0.30.209 are failing on a PPC machine.
> ...
> http://vserver.13thfloor.at/S
Hello,
as you can see in
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/349-util-vserver-0.30.209-2.fc5/ppc/build.log
two check of util-vserver 0.30.209 are failing on a PPC machine. AFAIR
same happened once for 0.30.208 but succeeded suddenly. Unfortunately,
I do not have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chuck) writes:
> phoenix rio # /etc/init.d/vservers start
> * Unhiding /proc entries ...
>
>
> [ ok ]
> * Starting vservers of type 'default' .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (alberto) writes:
> Mmmm, so it could be a beecrypt2 problem... right?
> I'll try installing from non-debian sources util-vserver and beecrypt
> to see what happens. The hash belongs to a real executable though
> (according to "file "), not sure which executable but
> something t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thorsten Gunkel) writes:
> In general this works great, but I had once or twice the problem
> that a service stopped working because it could not longer write to
> its files. Now I like to exclude the affected directory from the
> vhashify. http://linux-vserver.org/alpha+util-v
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (alberto) writes:
> I'm running debian sarge on amd64 (though I can reproduce the problem
> on another machine running on i386). Custom built debian package for
> util-vserver-0.30.208-fix2 with beecrypt2 enabled
> ...
> lstat("/etc/vservers/.defaults/apps/vunify/hash/0/04/00/000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steven Truong) writes:
> 1. I already got FC4 built with yum method, but then within the guest server
> I could not find yum command anywhere despite having the /etc/yum.repos.d/*
> in place. The guest server does not have anything beside syslog running.
> ...
> 3. Could somebo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steven Truong) writes:
> Hi, all. After following the advices from some experts here to
> use yum method instead of apt-rpm. I updated yum-2.4.0.0 to
> yum-2.4.0-0.chroot.fc4.
>
> However, I got this error of public key for tzdata is not
> installed error.
GPG keys are searched
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Wight) writes:
> I am seeing odd behaviour with bind mounts. For example, if I specify
>
> mount --bind /tmp /vservers/tkt/opt
>
> in pre-start, and
Be very careful when doing such stuff (resp. make sure that the vserver
is trusted). Else, an attacker within the vserver c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guenther Fuchs) writes:
>> Please try the patch from the contrib/ dir (the 2.3.4 one applies to 2.4
>> also). I built lots of FC4 vservers on FC4 hosts so it seems to work ;)
>
> Hmmm - found the patch but no real explanation on how to use it / i.e.
> what files to patch?! Is th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guenther Fuchs) writes:
> So I would recommend using yum - this works very fine here (as long as
> you ensure not using yum version 2.3 and _not_ 2.4 - later version
> breaks compatibility with Enrico's util-vserver tools)
Please try the patch from the contrib/ dir (the 2.3.4 o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steven Truong) writes:
> Hello, all. I am a vservers newbie. I have tried to setup vservers
> and learn more about it. I have FC4 x86 with kernel 2.6.12. I
> applied the patch-2.6.12.4-vs4 to the vanilla kernel. I also
> installed dietlibc-0.29, beecrypt-4.1.2-8, and util-v
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Harris) writes:
>> /usr/sbin/vserver prometheus exec /bin/rm -f
>> /var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine/new/*
> ...
> However, why not just use the host to remove the files?
Because of symlinks like
| /vservers/prometheus/var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine/new -> /etc
or an o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jun OKAJIMA) writes:
> I installed util-vserver-0.30.208 from tar ball and succeeded
> to compile it on my Debian Sarge box. And vserver start/enter
> and build -m debootsrap work.
>
> But, build -m rpm and vhashify does not work.
(I assume you mean '-m apt-rpm' here as it is u
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("lukas.rueegg [pixworx multimedia]") writes:
>> c) using the cleanup feature we added to the kernel
>> (please discuss this with Enrico)
> enrico, we read your talk with sam and others in november '04 but didn't
> get any hints about the current status. is there any way o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Roderick A. Anderson") writes:
> I've followed the instructions for FC3 --
> http://linux-vserver.org/FedoraCore3_HowTo --
Version number of util-vserver (0.30.205) is a little bit low in this
HowTo; there should be native support for fc3 in recent versions (see
point 8).
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karsten Horsmann) writes:
>> Somebody should report it at the Debian bugtracking system.
>
> Would be this Report enough?
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=320425
it seems to be the same issue, but I do not know if this report
is enough ;)
Enrico
pgpewVFeS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Harald Kapper) writes:
>>It was really trivial (<5 min) to take the 207 and make 208 debs. I've
>>posted my source packages at http://www.complete.org/~jgoerzen/vs/ for
>>anyone that wants them.
>>
>>They include fix1.
>
> thanks for the dsc - one odd thing came up through buil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Roderick A. Anderson") writes:
> I went ahead and started building the utils as RPMs and ran
> into a couple of dependency issues. This is probably more an
> Enrico question.
>
> Why tetex-latex? Is it Redhat ( RPM ) build-documentation
> requirement?
It is only a build-req
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Dariush Pietrzak,,,") writes:
>> >> legacy configuration does not have a big future and *would*
>> >> need security fixes first, this has a very low priority.
>> > What security fixes?
>>
>> Oh... where shall I begin? Basically, the filesystem operations
>> are full of races
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Dariush Pietrzak,,,") writes:
>> legacy configuration does not have a big future and *would*
>> need security fixes first, this has a very low priority.
> What security fixes?
Oh... where shall I begin? Basically, the filesystem operations
are full of races and contain enough
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Christophe Petit) writes:
> 2.6.12.3-vs2.0-rc9 with util-vserver-0.30.208 under CentOS 4
> followed the http://linux-vserver.org/CentOS_HowTo
>
> when in the vserver, "rpm -qa" gives nothing.
Expected; external packagemangement is used by default which holds rpm
database o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bert De Vuyst) writes:
> During some tests with the vserver 2.0-rc, I did have a problemen running
> vservers with a old style configuration. The vservers do run fine, but the
> vserver utils (vps, vserver-stat) can't display the vserver it's name.
>
> I run 2 vservers in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas John) writes:
> I wanted to create commented version of /etc/vservers//flags,
> but I was not able to find the right char for commenting out a line,
> neither # nor ; worked even // was not the solution.
Sorry; bug in util-vserver. Afair, somebody else mentioned it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Christophe Petit) writes:
> is it possible to upload a new version in
> http://www.13thfloor.at/~ensc/util-vserver/files/ ?
I will see; but there were some non-trivial changes in the script part
which I have to test first.
When you need the fix, you can try
http://savan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Ipsen) writes:
> Trying to build a new vserver using:
>
> # ./vserver-build -m yum -n test2 --hostname test2.domain.dk --interface
> test2=eth0:192.168.3.37/24 --context 10037 -- -d wbel4
>
> Due to the fact, that after RPM installation, I get a whole bunch of errors:
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herbert Poetzl) writes:
> hmm, isn't vwait --timeout 30 supposed to time out after
> 30 seconds and go wild on your remaining processes?
> (this one is for enrico)
There was a classical bug in the signal handling (glibc does not
interrupt vc_wait_exit() but restarts it by defau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matt Paine) writes:
> Its complaining about the GPG keys, so I installed it with.
>
> 8<
> rpm --import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY
> #(that didn't work, so i tried another one)
> rpm --import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora
> -->8-
That's not the right
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Benoît des Ligneris) writes:
> "Chasing" each and every config file of services started on your
> host (apache:443, SSH, mySQL, postgreSQL, etc.)
ssh should never be started through v_ssh as every shell inherits the
network restrictions else.So it will be impossible to do admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Ipsen) writes:
> Hmm... But the .rpmdb directory inside the guest os is empty
> when the yum installation finishes ? Should it be like that ?
Yes; that's ok and expected. Because of security reasons, the
rpmdb is located outside of the vserver.
| vserver pkgmgmt interna
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Ipsen) writes:
> I'm trying to install a WBEL4 client OS via yum (the RPM list has been
> attached here).
The rpm list does not matter (and is ignored by the '-m yum' method).
> Unfortunately, I have some issues with a messages, that pops up during
> installation.
It's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herbert Poetzl) writes:
>> I will fix it, although the v_* scripts will disappear soon.
>
> and be replaced by?
nothing ;)
I do not see much sense in these scripts. Most affected applications
(httpd, named, sendmail, ssh, xinetd) can be configured with "native"
methods to list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Ipsen) writes:
> After upgrading to v2.0-rc8.1 and installing utils 0.30.208 I get this
> error dusing startup of my server:
>
> Starting v_httpd: exec --ip eth0 /etc/init.d/httpd start
oops... some legacy scripts (inclusive vsysvwrapper) were not updated to
a new naming
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Ipsen) writes:
> # ./vserver-build --force -m yum -n dns-int1 -- -d wbel4
> ...
> error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/bin/X11;42dd8791: cpio:
> symlink failed - No such file or directory
Happens due to a bug in rpm[1]. That's why, an 'initpre' script must be
e
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Ipsen) writes:
> #./vserver-build --force -m yum -n dns-int1 -- -d wbel4
> Renamed '/etc/vservers/dns-int1' to '/etc/vservers/dns-int1.~1121798195~'
> ftp://ftp.riken.jp/Linux/whitebox/Null/en/os/i386/repodata/repomd.xml:
The yum a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Ipsen) writes:
> My "base" vserver is up and running (with the vserver kernel) - the problem
> is creating a virtual server... I'm running WhiteBox Enterprise Linux 4 (a
> RHEL clone), but have difficulties figuring out how to create the
> distribution stuff - and where d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herbert Poetzl) writes:
>> > it seems to be impossible to use the audit (CONFIG_AUDIT) interface
>> > of the kernel within a vserver:
>> >
>> > | # auditctl -m 'foo'
>> > | Error sending user message request (Operation not permitted)
>> > ...
>> > This gives problems on Fedora
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Enrico Scholz) writes:
> | # auditctl -m 'foo'
> | Error sending user message request (Operation not permitted)
> ...
> This gives problems on Fedora Core 4 as recent pam upgrade is
> using this functionality and most actions (su, cron) will fail
>
Hello,
it seems to be impossible to use the audit (CONFIG_AUDIT) interface
of the kernel within a vserver:
| # auditctl -m 'foo'
| Error sending user message request (Operation not permitted)
The generated syscalls are:
| socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW, 9) = 3
| fcntl64(3, F_SETFD, FD_CLOE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nicolas Costes) writes:
> make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/util-vserver-0.30.207'
> ...
> PASS: src/testsuite/chcontext-test
> Invalid IP number or host name 'localhost'
'localhost' can not be resolved. Depending on your distribution,
/etc/hosts might not be crea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Enrico Scholz) writes:
> | $ diet gcc x.c
> | $ strace ./a.out
> | execve("./a.out", ["./a.out"], [/* 41 vars */]) = 0
> | old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
> 0) = 0x97f47000
> | mremap(0x97f4
Hi,
just to exclude possible failure-sources (I do not have time to
test a real vanilla 2.6.12.2 kernel, but at least a RH kernel is
fine), does somebody see why code like
| #include
| int main()
| {
| char *p = malloc(3000);
| realloc(p, 5000);
| }
fails on 2.6.12.2 + patch-2.6
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (gary ng) writes:
> I just did a little more experiment and can now establish vpn links
> with outside using either pptp(Windows) or openvpn, from within a
> vserver.
I run a lot of vservers with OpenVPN (indeed, every physical host has such
a vserver). Important settings are: N
Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> That's the kind of tests which can only be done by the developer ;)
>> But other work and fear of zombies stopped me to play with 'vserver
>> ... stop' till now...
>
> didn't get a bugreport regarding those zombies yet
afais, Gilles reported in [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herbert Poetzl) writes:
>> > while we are at it, how would I 'build' a release tar archive
>> > (i.e. clean everything up which doesn't go into your releases)
>> > or a source rpm from the cvs sources?
>>
>> Do you mean something like 'make dist'?
>> ...
>> rpms can be built wi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herbert Poetzl) writes:
> while we are at it, how would I 'build' a release tar archive
> (i.e. clean everything up which doesn't go into your releases)
> or a source rpm from the cvs sources?
Do you mean something like 'make dist'? Specifying 'CVS2CL=:
RCS2LOG=:' should speedu
Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> probably I'm just too dumb to figure it myself, but how would you
> build the tools from the savannah CVS?
checkout, execute 'autoreconf -i -f' and then './configure ...' && make
> /usr/share/aclocal/pkg.m4:5: warning: underquoted definition of
> PK
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Roderick A. Anderson") writes:
> If I upgrade/install a new 2.6 vserver kernel on an existing
> system _*should*_ my old vservers ( created with a 2.4 kernel )
> still work. I realize there might be a few gotchas but for the
> most part should they work?
File attributes have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Jorgensen) writes:
> However, I'm getting errors about gpg keys not existing. I had
> set gpgcheck=0 in all the *.repo files (both in /etc/yum.repos.d
> and /usr/lib/util-vserver/...).
GPG keys will be added automatically from
| "$__CONFDIR/.distributions/$DISTRIBUTI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Paul S. Gumerman") writes:
> Is there anywhere to be found an explanation of how package management
> works with the new util-vserver system?
I would suggest (for Fedora based systems):
1. create your own yum or apt repository by:
a) copy all the shipped RPMs somewhere int
Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> mmh... I am not very happy with the way how this was solved, because:
>
> well, if you would show up now and then on the channel
> we might have taken a different approach ... but I
> guess although the various aspects might not be perfect,
> IMHO the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sam Vilain) writes:
> I have set up a new project on OpenFoundry.org for util-vserver.
> OpenFoundry is like SourceForge, except it doesn't suck.
>
> http://utilvserver.openfoundry.org/
>
> (no hyphens allowed in project names! bummer)
>
> For now the important thing it has
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ola Lundqvist) writes:
> * Is a dependency on perl for building acceptable? I need it as one
> of the manpages (vserver-build) is written in .pod format and need
> pod2man (provided by perl) to convert to manpage format. I'm not
> sure what you think about that. I can probably r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ola Lundqvist) writes:
> lib_internal/unify-copy.c: In function `copyMMap':
> lib_internal/unify-copy.c:142: error: `MADV_SEQUENTIAL' undeclared (first use
> in this function)
mmh... a dietlibc issue
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dietlibc/dietlibc-0.28-madv.patch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcel de Riedmatten) writes:
> I am playing with with the new debian package util-vserver 0.30.204-5,
> thanks to Ola for that. I dont want some vserver to be started
> automaticaly at startup so i don't put the "default" mark for that one.
> But when i shutdown the machine and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Commission Scolaire de Laval Laval") writes:
> I believe I'm experiencing problems with my vserver since I miss a
> great amount of commands, like "passwd" and "rpm" for example. I'd
> like to know what I did wrong.
Nothing; it is intended to work in this way. Depending on you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Frost) writes:
>> That's not possible. During the extraction phase, 'rpm' has to do
>> an username -> uid mapping with the setup from the inside of the
>> chroot. So at least there, I need getpwname() after chroot().
>
> Sorry for the double-reply but additionally, is th
Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> just tried to 'update' my rpms to the latest release of util-vserver
> for testing (0.30.206) but it seems that this version will need some
> time to become usable, no?
>
> checking whether to enable dietlibc... no (too old; 0.29+ required, 0.28
> foun
Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> I guess it was using _syscall3() instead of syscall().
>> ...
>> To clearify things:
>>
>> util-vserver prefers to use _syscall3() (which is called 'fast'
>> syscall invocation method in the ./configure output) when it is
>> available. _syscall3()
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Frost) writes:
>> >> according to Enrico (please confirm or correct) the glibc
>> >> has issues with the fake name resolver and is generally
>> >> considered insecure because usually dynamically linked ...
>> >
>> > This really needs further explanation and justification
Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > no, thanks I already figured it, the dietlibc needs
>> > patching as the syscall(2) for x86_64 isn't implemented
>> >
>> > .o( I wonder _what_ is running on your machine ;)
>>
>> I guess it was using _syscall3() instead of syscall(). Shouldn't it?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Frost) writes:
>> according to Enrico (please confirm or correct) the glibc has issues
>> with the fake name resolver and is generally considered insecure
>> because usually dynamically linked ...
>
> This really needs further explanation and justification. What about
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin Pendleton) writes:
> When you try to use the vserver build -m copy function it requires a
> file that does not exist.
Yes, this is expected because this method is not implemented yet. Sorry,
I should remove it from the help text
Enrico
pgptFzisI6GK1.pgp
Descripti
Kevin Pendleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I try to use the vserver build -m apt-rpm function to create a fc3
> vserver on a centos host with util-vserver-0.30.205, I get the following
> output:
>
> vserver base-fc3 build -m apt-rpm --hostname domain.com --interface
> domain=eth0:192.168.0
Hello,
I discovered some irregularities regarding fakeinit functionality. The
following program gives different output on host and vservers:
| int main(int argc, char *argv[])
| {
| printf("%i\n", getsid(atoi(argv[1])));
| }
On host:
| # ./a.out 1
| 0
on VServer:
| # chcontext --xid 100 --f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Paul S. Gumerman") writes:
> Ran "vserver fc3-reference hashify", which ran ok with one message
> (sorry, can't recall it now).
The exact message would be helpful perhaps.
> Then tried "vserver loco-reference hashify" which failed with a
> message saying "vserver ... suexec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Paul S. Gumerman") writes:
> Where can I find this?
Sorry, please use the
http://www.nongnu.org/util-vserver/
homepage or the savannah projectpage
https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/util-vserver/
Enrico
pgpg07da9qMcN.pgp
Description: PGP signatu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Olivier Poitrey) writes:
>> what about LYCOS? They are using vserver and get much money with
>> it. They also provide Internet-Access.
>> Here a link for the german readers:
>> http://www.lycos.de/startseite/online/internetzugang.html
>>
>> Should Enrico ask them for some mon
Hello,
version 0.30.205 util-vserver (alpha branch) is out. Noticable changes
are a new 'vhashify' command which is a successor of 'vunify'. It uses
some aggressive techniques like mmap'ing of files and the creation of
sparse files. To prevent data lossage, it is strongly recommended to
execute 'm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timo Müller) writes:
> hmm
> how can I disable selinux?
http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc3/index.html#id2825880
Enrico
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timo Mueller) writes:
> Can I here:
> /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/util-vserver-0.30.204/distrib/fc3/apt/rpmpriorities
>
> Configure what packages been installed when I build a new vserver?
> Or what stand this (rpmpriorities) for?
That's a configuration file for apt. It is used by ut
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timo Mueller) writes:
> But just for my understanding: What is this -initpre- and
> whydoes it work now?
This is a script which will be executed before unpackaging the
files. It works because it workarounds
>>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52725
The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timo Müller) writes:
> I´ve a FedoraCore3 vserver and I wanna change the password for an
> user and then ...
>
> passwd test
> passwd: root:system_r:unconfined_t is not authorized to change the
> password of test
Disable SELinux. Its kernel API (/proc/self/attr + /selinux)
mak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timo Müller) writes:
> where can i change that ??
>
> Can not find a vserver-setup at '/usr/local/etc/vservers//'.
See README for the ./configure options which create "expected"
paths.
Enrico
pgpVWwiaozYHy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timo Müller) writes:
> this error comes wehen I want to build a fc3 vserver!
> ...
>2:filesystem
>### [ 29%]
> Fehler: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/bin/X11;422ffd85:
> cpio: symlink failed - No such file or directory
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timo Müller) writes:
> I´ve build a fc2 vserver and I can start it and enter it but I can´t
> stop it.
> This error comes or it dont go on (i think it can´t shutdown that
> interface) But why ??:
mmh... the network initscripts should have been disabled by
'vserver ... build' (t
1 - 100 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
